1. It is completely hypocritical to Even presume that Atheists are not capable of committing the same atrocities as theists, or to focus on Evil things that theists have done to make a point about why religion its self is evil.
Well nobody presumed that that atheist couldn't do bad things. My point was that atheist or theist must be drove by other motives than just the fact that they believe in god or they don't. Because that's what atheist and theism is, just the fact of believing in a deity or not believing. There is no logical path from going "i believe in god", to "therefore i should do this or that".
However, if you are a religious theist, and you have been told your whole life that there is just one God,and that a certain book is the true word of this all powerful god.
And If it is written in this book that:
-any uncircumcized male should be cut-off from his family (genesis 17:14), or that
-homosexual, unbelievers, sorcerers and what-not deserves to burn in a lake of fire for eternity, or that
-anyone who don't listen to the priest should be put to death (Deuteronomy 17:12), or that
-your god commands you to kill the unbelievers (Quran 2:191), or that
-if you fight and die for your god you will go to heaven (Quran 3:157),
-or.....see where i'm going?
Well then if makes perfect sense that some violence and bad things would come out of it doesn't it?
In the same way, if you are a nationalist and you think that everyone that don't agree with the state should be killed, and this state happens to be atheist, then there is also something bad that would come out of it.
So no it doesn't make sense to hold atheism or theism responsible for the bad things that atheist or theist did. What should be held responsible, to some degree at least, are the doctrines associated with a certain form of communism, christianism and islamism.
2. There are more examples of Theists committing said atrocities than atheists because there are a lot more theists in the world than atheists.
i'm not adding numbers, i'm only criticizing ideologies and doctrines associated with religions. I could do the same for ussr communism, but for some reason i don't think that's much relevent today is it?
Religions based on a book where killings and massacres and divine commands are ever so present, tends to be more violent than others, i'm just saying that maybe there is a connection to be made...that's all.
Edited 8/14/2015 03:12:57