3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 11:52:56 |
Guiguzi
Level 58
Report
|
Europe 3v3 Ladder: 4 starts of 4, 0% SR, cycling orders.
The new world order is at hand.
Edited 9/27/2015 08:30:06
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 12:00:04 |
professor dead piggy
Level 59
Report
|
Where did you see 4 starts of 5 armies...SR 0%...Base Income 5? I dont see people playing that shit at all. Thank god.
The 3v3 europe clot uses option2. My favourite is not listed: 4 starts of 4 armies, 0% WR base income 5. Slowwwly does it, no clamouring for FTBs and big bonuses are mostly impossible. The turn2 UK and norway games are boring and awful.
Edit: oh, fizzer has made another bad template, Shrug.
Edited 9/26/2015 12:11:03
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 12:01:07 |
Guiguzi
Level 58
Report
|
Edited 9/26/2015 12:13:51
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 12:10:33 |
Buns157
Level 68
Report
|
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 12:30:34 |
Sephiroth
Level 61
Report
|
That's so sad, lottery for the first pick.
Maybe tell this to fizzer during his AMA, I hope he will understand and tweak the template
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 12:34:38 |
szeweningen
Level 60
Report
|
Years of asking for 3v3 ladder, multiple template tests, getting a general community agreement on what are the optimal settings, multiple high-level tournaments played on 3v3 europe and Fizzer apparently knows better what settings to use. Use 4x4 if you have 5 base income, you can modify the template since there are no games played yet.
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 13:10:21 |
Master Ryiro
Level 63
Report
|
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 18:43:21 |
Fizzer
Level 64
Warzone Creator
Report
|
You're right -- this was just a mistake. I just adjusted the initial armies for player territories to 4.
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-26 18:46:44 |
GeniusJKlopp
Level 61
Report
|
It would be better with 3x4 I think.
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-27 02:26:49 |
Strategos
Level 54
Report
|
Thank you, Fizzer. Can the games in their picking stages be replaced?
|
3v3 Europe: 2015-09-27 08:28:19 |
Guiguzi
Level 58
Report
|
1v1 ladder: I don't mind the new settings. I just prefer the old settings. The map changes picking and play a bit. 0% SR changes picking, play, technique, expansion, everything. Cycling orders is best for 1v1s (though I prefer random orders for almost everything). I'll adjust.
2v2 ladder: Sure, it isn't ideal. But a change to 0% WR, 16% SR or 0% SR (in the order of my preferences) is definitely better than 16% WR. Cycling move orders...this is alright for 2v2s I guess. I'll let my teammate be my accountant!
3v3 ladder: We got it! I'd prefer 0% WR or even 16% SR. Cycling orders is annoying, since there are 6 players to keep track of. Too much counting. I guess I have to be more of a computer when I play Europe 3v3. I'll talk to myself in team chat with 0s and 1s...
"Voodoo, what should we do?" "00000111000000 111000001000000" "Ok. Got it."
Edited 9/27/2015 08:29:23
|