3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-01 17:11:04 |
ChrisCMU
Level 61
Report
|
Just curious, how would you rank the top 10 teams that are joined on the ladder right now: https://www.warlight.net/LadderTeams?ID=4&Offset=0Since we have a clean slate, it will be interesting how everything sorts out with all the solo/alt teams on there.
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-01 19:02:41 |
Ox
Level 58
Report
|
mm3100, The Shots, and Noobster11 are going to do well.
A lot better than Death, OxTheArtist and Prabster Realm :D
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 05:03:27 |
Strategos
Level 54
Report
|
Sze and Gnuff will try to race to first place, playing weak teams. If they lose a game or two early, expect them to quit without continuing (like when an informal 3v3 ladder was made and they didn't dominate like they were supposed to).
I will eventually be in first, if I say my prayers and eat my vitamins.
First place will be a revolving door like the 1v1 ladder. Too much guesswork, pick lottery, and accounting to throw us off.
But HHH never will be in first unless he gets new teammates. Two teams I'm currently playing would beat HHH, and they aren't on anyone's mind.
Lots of dark horses out there, though they are dark because few know about them. Big names matter less than good play.
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 05:07:42 |
Heyheuhei
Level 57
Report
|
Qi, you can win against me only by boot. You cant win fair like others regulars kids
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 05:41:05 |
[IM]YouMustBeKidding
Level 58
Report
|
@MasterTurtle: Apart from your nonsense ranking before most players finished their first game I have a question:
ChrisCMU x3 ChrisCMU is controlling all 3 accounts?
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 06:03:30 |
[IM]YouMustBeKidding
Level 58
Report
|
Kidding this thread is about making nonsense ratings. If everyone would know the outcime already, what a boring ladder would that be! All right... here a little sample size of: - Masters vs "Player to bad to join M'Hunters: https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=9489544
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 08:06:45 |
szeweningen
Level 60
Report
|
My 3v3 ladder prediction is that the ladder will do much better than 2v2 ladder. Now only 1 week in we have 45 teams ~= 135 active players. 2v2 ladder after years of being established has 65 teams which mean ~= 130 players. And that is only 1 week after start of the ladder.
RIP 2v2 ladder.
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 08:20:29 |
Vladimir Vladimirovich
Level 61
Report
|
people were just looking for somethign new, once the first scores are established most of these teams will become inactive just like in the 2v2
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 09:38:03 |
Strategos
Level 54
Report
|
ps wants uservoice links for any ideas offered.
HHH, if I could, I would have booted you from the game after turn 3 or 4, when you were completely hopeless. Skunk's team made me eliminate everyone. It feels like you are doing the same.
Edited 10/2/2015 13:40:19
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 12:23:29 |
Pulsey
Level 56
Report
|
Indeed. Notwithstanding the popularity of the EU 3v3 template, once the novelty appeal goes, the number of teams will most likely decrease, in my opinion. Then everybody will be looking new things. Maybe if we look a few years down the road, we'll have a new ladder.
If only Qi would be around to pester and petition for a new ladder then... a shame he declared to leave after his ragequit a while ago... :/
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 13:07:19 |
Burning River
Level 56
Report
|
Qi, i didnt have time play with my 3 nicks at time anymore, i will go into vacation for 50 days, after this i will do same with other nick, later i will take turn every time 2 days 22 hours and you will eliminate me after 1 year, so you will be ranked at best after year too. And this is your choice. Of course i will surrender in the others ladder games before it (Altough against gnuff puppet i will be booted, he isnt worth my surrender like you)
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 13:45:14 |
Strategos
Level 54
Report
|
Neither "ragequit" nor "nick" are words. I think I need to provide more Sesame Street links, to help educate the masses.
About the thread's topic:
- Pulsey talks about a gradual decline in the number of teams as "the novelty appeal [sic] goes [sic]." I disagree. The number of players who understand, enjoy, and play 3v3 Europe has increased with time over the years. Having autogames and a ladder will only add to 3v3 Europe's popularity.
- Szeweningen lauds the total number of teams. This is shameful statistical analysis from a purported economist who loves math. If I control three accounts, that does not mean there are three players on my team. There is but one, me.
- I think this ladder will be far more fluid than the 2v2 ladder, and the average "shelf life" of a team will be less. Teams with one player will provide stability to the ladder. It is probably more preferable to have one-player teams on the 3v3 as opposed to the 2v2 ladder: the settings are better (greater willingness to play alone); there is more to talk about (some of us don't have time to discuss things in great detail or live in time zones that would not make communication with teammates especially efficient); and having two teammates increases the likelihood of boots.
- Nonetheless, the accounting work is greater, so this is the downside of playing alone. Thankfully, HHH is willing to delay surrendering for the rest of his "WarLife," so my game count will actually be 1. This will reduce the burden of being my own accountant.
- I think Awesomeguy's list is the most accurate. There are too many unknown teams.
Edited 10/2/2015 14:06:22
|
3v3 ladder predictions: 2015-10-02 14:02:22 |
Heyheuhei
Level 57
Report
|
np, glad to help for ya
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|