japan im talking about the jewish race you dumbass, but i do believe in separation of church and state and thats why its in the constitution its common sense. thats actually a good diversionary tactic though, its a common jew tactic to divert attention and then change the subject to religion allowing you to attack christians probably the most peaceful religion in modern history.

Edited 10/13/2015 01:29:02

*least peaceful religion in modern history

it is the most peaceful.

No, not in any way shape or form is it the most peaceful. When several countries commit genocide, put up concentration camps , start ethnic cleansing and gas people in the name of a religion, that kinda denies it the title of most peaceful religion.

(Referring to colonialism)

that implies colonialism was a bad thing and that the christians there were out to kill them simply because they weren't christian which is a blatant lie. Also the bible itself advocates pacifism whereas the quaran and talmud justify genocide. No where in the new testament (only part relevant to christians) does it justify genocide.

Edited 10/13/2015 02:04:58

Edited 10/13/2015 02:05:44

Killing millions is a bad thing. If you disagree you're a dumbass, but we already figured out you're a dumbass haven't we?

when did the christians kill millions of people due to their religion or race?

they introduced laws like not being able to buy liquor before noon on Sundays

Oh what terrible oppression. Not being able to buy your booze 24/7.

Removing religious influence over any government by outlawing it would probably work the best,

No. It's called Freedom of Religion, not Freedom from Religion. Religious groups should have the same voice in government as secular ones.

as that solves your jewish influence problem, and the Middle East's Islamic Influence problem, and America's Christian right influence problem

1. There's no such thing as a "Jewish influence problem".

2. The Middle East's problems are not caused by Islamic influence in the government, but by extremist radical groups who probably couldn't manage a third-world country with any success.

3. Spare me. Christian influence has been rapidly declining and it's often the Secular special interest groups that whine about every little symbol of religion who get their way.

God bless the Merkel.

Edited 10/13/2015 02:23:43

Irish potatoe famine. Britain used callus strategies to make the famine as bad as possible to starve out as many Irishmen as possible. More then a million dead for ethnicity and religion(Catholicism).

@KarlGoldberg674

I see many people here have problem to understand what you are saying. All you wrote about jews and christianity is 100% true ;)

I just want to add that people in power in west/america no longer commit the crimes and start wars(middle east) in the name of religion. But crime will be crime, no matter if in the name of greed, religion, influence or other potential source of hatred.

Edited 10/13/2015 02:29:21

But crime will be crime, no matter if in the name of greed, religion, influence or other potential source of hatred.

This. Too many people like using religion as a scapegoat. But the fact of the matter is that bad people will do bad things, take away one excuse and they'll easily find another.

@Major_General_Smedley_Butler

And the reason for this is not that Irishmen were christian, but because Irishmen were Irish.

@Eklipse

Nice to agree ;)

Edited 10/13/2015 02:33:25

I just want to add that people in power in west/america no longer commit the crimes and start wars(middle east) in the name of religion.

Wars declared by governments for promoting just their faith have mostly stopped since the Ninth Turkish-Persian War (1743-1746).

@Жұқтыру

I know its obvious but General Smedley claims that christianity is the least "least peaceful religion in modern history"

Cheers

indeed christian doctrine is strictly pacifistic unlike that of the islamists and jews. The english persecuted the irish because anglos are racists not because of their religion.

Edited 10/13/2015 02:40:03

I understand that it is Freedom of Religion. I just don't agree with people attempting to force their religious beliefs onto others because they control the majority. That's why I'm arguing for a complete removal of religious influence over the gov't, as then the majority religion will rule.

The examples I stated are ones that are commonly ignored, but here are a couple more: Abortion(Christians want it outlawed due to its violation of their beliefs)
The term "God" in the pledge of Allegiance (Any Atheist in the military is clearly having their first amendment violated)