<< Back to Ladder Forum   Search

Posts 21 - 40 of 61   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>   
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 02:21:56


crafty35a 
Level 3
Report
Sorry, ignore the first "but" which is making my previous post sound odd. Should have said this:

Yes, but it will affect how often that bonus is picked -- but it will not affect winning percentage when that bonus is picked, which is what I am using as my ranking criteria.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 02:23:08


crafty35a 
Level 3
Report
I'm a moron. Didn't remove the offending word, again:

Yes, it will affect how often that bonus is picked -- but it will not affect winning percentage when that bonus is picked, which is what I am using as my ranking criteria.

-----

By the way, no one has mentioned the best or worst territory yet!
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 02:35:14

fatguyinalittlecoat 
Level 3
Report
Best territory is India. Worst is Eastern US.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 02:48:12

bostonfred 
Level 7
Report
best territory is east africa. worst is central russia.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 02:49:53


Duke 
Level 5
Report
It's cause you said "occupied" which to mean meant you held the bonus, not the starting spot. Which also explains most of my criticism.

It's probably cuasacus then. Assuming it's weighted. If it's like Fizz said and one guy picks EU (Nuck I'm thinking of you) and wins, and he's the only one who ever picked EU, that means EU is the best because it' resulted in a win 100% of games it was picked. or some similar weird spot picked as a counterpick.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 03:05:30


crafty35a 
Level 3
Report
Here's the data. This includes the first 1224 games on the ladder. The numbers have actually changed a bit since I included another 50 games or so after starting this thread. The previous worst bonus is now second worst.

![](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c364/crafty35a/Warlight/Strategic1v1BonusValue_2011-03-17.png)

Biggest surprises, to me:
- South Africa being so terrible. I didn't think it was a prime spot, but I wouldn't have guessed it was that bad.
- Caucasus below 40%
- West Russia at number 1
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 03:19:04

Fizzer 
Level 64

Warzone Creator
Report
Interesting! South Africa does have a poor income/territories ratio, however I would prefer South Africa to North Africa even though this data shows otherwise.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 03:19:52

bostonfred 
Level 7
Report
that data isn't really surprising at all.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 03:21:27

Fizzer 
Level 64

Warzone Creator
Report
|> that data isn't really surprising at all.

I hate to be the one to point it out, but your guesses above were pretty far off :)
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 03:34:47


Polaris 
Level 55
Report
personal preference

Favorite, indonesia

Least Favorites, East USA & East Russia
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 04:01:08

Guy Mannington 
Level 56
Report
Thanks for posting crafty
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 04:09:14

bostonfred 
Level 7
Report
of course i didn't guess right. i was told there were surprises, so i picked two middling spots that might have been the big shockers. but there werent really any big shockers. guessing that central america, scand, ant, the russias, indo, east china and s america are good isnt that surprising. guessing that canada, east russia, europe, and the americas are bad isnt really shocking either. and guessing the exact order is irrelevant since it will almost certainly change over time.

its interesting data. theres definitely some skew. a country thats good when done right - like east africa - might be better when you get another africa, but a trainwreck when your opponent does. a country that's better as a counterpick than an actual pick - like western US - may show up as winning more or less than it should. and it may be a self fulfilling prophecy where the top players tend to copy each other, and people who are paying attention tend to copy people who beat them, so the ones the top players pick may do better by the fact that the skill level of the guys playing them is higher. but if we can set aside the difference between the 4th best and 5th best countries and focus on the top ones, the data does seem to bear out what i think most of us would have expected. and that's good to know.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 04:12:26

TeddyFSB 
Level 60
Report
Very interesting data -- thank you crafty.

I was about to post Middle East for my candidate for worst pick but the data was already posted. Caucausus was my other choice for worst pick. West Russia as the very best is quite interesting too.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 04:25:52


Perrin3088 
Level 49
Report
whoops, I meant to say aussie as my worst, not ant, lmao
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 04:51:03

bostonfred 
Level 7
Report
hi, i'm the huge bonus that borders all of the faster better bonuses on the medium earth map. i take several turns to get and i'm not that much more valuable than the smaller, easier, and more defensible bonuses around me. you might remember me because i was overpowered on the original earth map but i totally suck on this one. if you're planning on getting me, maybe you should start in the russias and work your way down instead of wasting a starting spot. if you guessed that i'm caucusus, you're right.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 05:01:56


Knoebber 
Level 55
Report
lol @ bostenfred
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 05:57:54

The Impaller 
Level 9
Report
I'm not surprised. My guess for the shocker number 1 was going to be Indonesia. I thought Antartica would be a lot lower than it is. I find, generally speaking, that it's the worst out of the 3 armies for 4 territory bonuses (Central, Scandinavia, India), but I guess the data suggests otherwise.

I'm not too surprised by Caucasus either. It's value significantly decreased with the Russia's becoming much stronger. It's now more of a counter pick to an East or West Russia rather than something you legitimately expect to get early.
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 10:37:21


Math Wolf 
Level 64
Report
To counter all the criticism.

As far as I checked it, this analysis is completely sound and as unbiased as possible.
However, I'd like to add a column with the standard errors, confidence intervals and tests though, it gives a lot more information! (inference versus just descriptive statistics)

**Error**: the standard errors of the win%, this depends on the sample size, in this case the number of times occupied, and the success probability itself (win%).
**95% Conf. interval**: lower and upper boundaries of the 95% confidence interval. Interpretation: we are 95% sure that the population wise true (unknown) win% (over an infinite number of games) falls within these borders. For the blue and red territories, 50% is not included, the blue territories score better than 50%, the red worse.
**P-value**: Test to check whether the underlying probability of West-Russia and another territory are different. Interpretation of the %: how likely is it that when West-Russia and the given territory have the same underlying probability, that we get these data? When this value is smaller than 5%, this is very unlikely and we conclude that the given territory has a significantly lower probability. For the bold territories, we CANNOT conclude this. The territory with the underlying best probability is thus one of the 8 territories in bold.

If anyone has any more questions, please ask.

![](http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy286/Math_Wolf/9d3de5e2.png)
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 13:54:32


chas 
Level 43
Report
Fizzer, I think it would be interesting to use a new map configuration at some point. I think just bumping the bottom 10 or 11 bonuses from this list up by 1 would make this map even more interesting...
Starting spots: The Best and the Worst (Finally, real data!): 2011-03-18 14:28:04


Duke 
Level 5
Report
Mine were pretty spot on: "Scan/Antartica and Mexico. After that it's the choice 4s: East China/West Russia/E&W Africa."


I got 5 of the top 7. It's probably 6 of the top 8 too, since Mexico isn't on the chart.
Posts 21 - 40 of 61   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  Next >>