Yeah i did abit though those templates are that similar to the ladder ones are they?

NO, This is Farming!



There goes the saying that a picture is worth more than 1000 words: I guess that´s true and even more, when half the population ranks poor on critical thinking and functional reading skills!

Hmm i wanted to pratice for the RT ladder and obviously being a low level i couldn't replicate the templates so i thought joining auto games would atleast get me used to the cards and countering.

Nex, I originally tried the same idea, but once I was able to play the RT ladder, I quickly found out that it uses a set of random templates, only some of which resemble standard 1v1. The ladder you're looking for is the 1v1 ladder, which unfortunately requires a higher level than the RT ladder. I found the RT ladder quite hard to get started on because the templates are so different than what I was used to, and when I tried to play I would always get paired up with someone who actually knew the templates and would crush me. If you want to practice for the RT ladder, you could try playing on those templates as multi-day versions to get used to them; or, just accept a heavy loss rate at the beginning as you learn the templates.

Thanks yeah finally got to the level to join the RT ladder and i decided to take the losses and you are definitely right that pratice did not help.

"ppl still farm stats? i thought that died with the Elite clan." - ps

Depends what farming means. Atm I have 89% 1v1, I haven't farmed in the sense that Elite did. I have farmed in the sense of joining random autogames and just playing random people rather than specifically targeting only good opponents.

But then again, winning 60-70% against top players is much better than "good". That's more akin to best of the best - very few people can win 70% of their games vs. top 20 ladder opponents for example.

You've been challenged.

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=10254882

Ha! With me, it's far easier to know if I'm a noob than comparing stats! I just gotta look at my name.

Oh...yeah...I suck.

Apparently his open challenge really means you must challenge on non-earth maps, with no wastelands, and with multi-attack. Also multi-attack is less luck-based than non multi-attack and wastelands make games all about luck.

Probably have to have a lower winrate than him for him to accept too.

Edited 1/10/2016 03:18:59

Stats don't tell you how good someone are. They do tell you something through.

1. What someone plays (1v1 etc.)
2. What they are bad at (bootrate, avg. move time,)

Ranked Games

Completed 22 ranked games (20 / 22)

1v1: 20 / 22 (91%)

Yes, I've clearly got a lower winrate than you.

I assume templates like these, which he considers strategic:

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=10254981

You can obviously tell how good he is here.

Well, yeah, he's lightyears better than you or awesomeguy, his teammate just let him down :P

(Yes, that is sarcasm.)

Asmodeus (KarlGoldberg) knows he's rubbish at Strat 1v1, which is why he declined MasterOfWarZone's invite and said the template wasn't strategic at all. He likes to live in his little world of MA games where he can easily win (except in the game Miles posted)

How can you be L55 with such stats https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=6651556183 ??

@Mike Kongregate transfer likely.

Not gonna lie :

"NO THIS IS FARMING" made me roflllll.

Also Ryz your stats are hidden. something to hide?

No, but at least they're not as bad as your KarlGoldberg674 account last time I checked (31/88 (35%)). And on my alt my winrate is quite high, but I'd rather keep my alt hidden

Edited 1/10/2016 09:00:09

Exlains why your bio says:

Bio: Just the demonic prince of lust trying to tempt some good mortals. If you have something you want to discuss feel free to skype me at KarlGoldberg

I don't need to check his stats to tell that guy is an idiot. All those stupid comments and threads on the forum. Thanks god i can hide them

I've yet to see anyone who wasn't a fucking pleb ever use the word triggered in that context.