I think we both have good points. Why do I not engage with you much of the time? Because I like you but you have a tendency to personally attack me which I don't like and because I like you I chose not brush that far :)

Took this down because some people were upset by some of the things I said. Again, I'm sorry if that was you.

Edited 2/4/2016 14:25:56

USSR is stable ofc.

Join royal entente, were basically the same thing

What changed? The level of stability has always been the same. I admit though the large majority of those who joined right at its creation were people I'd played with and met during my time here.

The most stable clan in WL is DARKLORDS, period

How? There are other clans with 1 sole manager.

Well, I have never heard of a DARKLORD Hijacking or them significantly changing anything

Changing things doesn't imply stability.

I've never heard of a {W.U} hijacking, and they have a sole manager.

There are many "most stable" clans on Warlight, as there are many clans who have never been hijacked :P

Now please stop, this discussion is getting pointless.

Just because a "famous" WL player makes something, does not mean it will be a success just purely for that name brand. I did not make The Royal Empire, I took in control of it and reformed it into a very simple, but fun, system in which all players can be active and have clan games and competitions. Just because "Lundy" or "Kyger" is a creator or member does not mean it will have success. USSR was not un-stable, me and Kyger created that system and it took a good 1 1/2 hr originally, then me and him continued to perfect the system until it was perfect. By the time it was perfect I had no reason to be their so I left. And when I made the Royal Empire a good solid system I left it to a Leader, who atm is trying to dis the credibility of these respectable clans. Obviously you changed the whole system of Royal, but yet that was your decision and I hope it works out. I made my own clan, and it shall be a fun Mafia-Themed clan, and it will hopefully grow, not because I made it, or Kyger helped me, but for it shall have a fun system to follow and a stable leader, who is not stupid to give up rights leading to a hijack. I strongly believe the system the Clan follows, and a strong leader is what makes Clans fun and large, not name brand.

-King Lundy

Sorry to anyone who thought what I was saying was supposed to be derogatory towards the people I was talking about. USSR has never been a "bad" clan, there were just some problems when I was there within the government. It had nothing to do with the clan itself, it had to do with a few of the people within the clan government. I fully believe a clan has to have a fun system and a strong leader to be successful, I was just saying having a famous name helps a lot. Sorry.

Seeing as I've been mentioned, no offense was taken. As long as your members and you have fun it doesn't matter haha.

The quality of a clan is inversely related to how much recruiting they attempt to do on the forums