Yes, brilliant idea.

We should also reward getting booted, going PE in diplos, stalling ladders, and hijacking clans!

Makes sense in large FFA's when you come 2nd out of 40 players. But not worth the effort to implement in my opinion.

@Ox i so agree that is best idea ever you should user voice it

but i would add rigging games to that

Edited 3/6/2016 18:28:40

I still demand points for 200 games that I won years before the whole level system.

okay okay people, i get it

I generally feel that in an FFA, maybe second or even third could potentially win points.
However, I'm okay with the current system.

+1 buns.

In a 20+ player Ffa:
1st 100
2nd 33
3rd 11

In a 10+ player FFA:
1st 100
2nd 25
3rd 8
In a 5+ player Ffa:
1st 100
2nd 20
(percent)

2nd in what regard? Most armies? 2nd man standing? 2nd highest income? I think armies is the way to go tbh if you're going to give points to multiple players.

The actual definition of second or third player might be difficult indeed, but I like the idea of them getting some points in (team-)FFA games. That way, people are encouraged to keep playing even if they are losing, thus making the game more about strategy instead of "my early neighbour surrendered after I got the upper hand and yours didn't, so I win the game".

^ Like wot I said

On a similar topic:

Should XP be given out for 'VtE'ed games (even split between all remaining players)?

By 2nd I mean the last player to be eliminated/booted and 3rd is the penultimate player to be eliminated/booted.

Edited 3/7/2016 16:38:46

This is definitely not on Fizzer's roadmap then...