I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-16 10:49:03 |

Madmen
Level 57
Report
|
add me
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-17 22:11:14 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
I don't know enough about India, specially in the middle ages, to contest that. Meanwhile, you literally just made a whole video about it, so I'll just trust you with that :P
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-22 00:15:54 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
You mispelled "Al-Andalus" in basically every instance of it...
Also some cities should have a different value, in my opinion:
Alexandria: 8 - It was still a commercial hub in the eastern mediterranean. Probably the biggest, aside from G L O R I O U S Constantinople.
Cairo: 9 - The biggest, most powerful city of the muslims, weaker than Córdoba? :s
Damascus: 7 - Far more developed as a city than many other 6's out there.
Baghdad: 7 - Once again, overrated for a city that fell so easily to the turks.
Samarkand: 8 - The center of the Silk Road, biggest and most important city in central asia. Economically it was a hub just about as big and powerful as Damascus... In the middle of goddamn nowhere! A gem in the steppes.
Mecca: 4 - Zero economic importance, and not densely populated to be a 5. Literally the only thing it has is a big black rock that makes people pray.
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-22 00:32:09 |

zxctycxz [Ollie Bye]
Level 59
Report
|
About Al-Andalus, I'll correct it, but it's not a massive problem - that name doesn't actually appear in the map.
Alexandria: I'm trying to make the point that it was of lesser significance to Cairo, and each civilisation is limit to two tier-9 cities, but this is covered in your next suggestion -
Cairo vs Córdoba: Córdoba was actually the largest city in the whole world for a time during the early 1000s. By 1045, a Chinese city called Kaifeng overtook it, but it was nonetheless still an absolute giant, and larger than Cairo as far as I'm aware.
Damascus: Fair enough, I'll change it
Baghdad: Its population was well over 200 000 at this time, that surely noteworthy. The reason it fell to the Mongols was because pretty much everything around it had, and plus that's 200 years later anyway.
Samarkand: Again, point well made - I'll change it.
Mecca: Cities aren't just rated on their economic importance or population, they get extra points for being an influential religious or political centre. This is why Aachen and Rome score so highly.
Edited 5/22/2016 00:32:31
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-22 00:51:22 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
About Andalus, well, I know it's not on the map, but correcting it now might prevent the typo from showing up in the map itself. I still giggle at Murcia being called "Murica" everytime on your 30YW map.
Well, Aachen was also capital of the franks for some time; it was still a big city. There is a point on that. Rome was also quite big at the time. Mecca wasn't even the biggest city on Arabia.
As for Córdoba, I honestly didn't know that. Wow o_O
Anyhow; I maintain my point about Baghdad and Cairo. It was big, but not as powerful as Cairo. The Abbasid era was long gone; Cairo would be the center of political power for the islamic world for a VERY LONG TIME. It was the head of the Fatimids, the Ayyubids and later the Mamluks, taken over only in the 1500s by the Ottomans; and it was still a large and powerful city while under ottoman rule. The islamic world's political center would be Cairo until 1453, when Constantinople - now under turkish rule - took over.
Edited 5/22/2016 00:52:23
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-22 09:48:06 |
Mr. Map
Level 7
Report
|
I believe Cairo had a population of around 130,000 around 1045/1050
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-22 10:29:09 |
talia_fr0st
Level 59
Report
|
I'd love to test!
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-22 12:22:13 |

҈ * TeeMee123҈ *
Level 55
Report
|
fatimids seem really strong, more so than byzantium maybe
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-23 14:07:41 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
Yes, Cairo was really big and powerful. Since the Fatimid era, Egypt is the center of the muslim world, and all powerful caliphates were based on it. It was still recent, but a great city nonetheless. And considering the Seljuq invasion is one of the setups that weakened Baghdad to empower Cairo, that makes extra sense.
On the buddhists:
Qingdao, Luoyang, Chengdu are some examples of big cities worth a mention. Can't tell much about them though, I don't know my east asian history well enough.
Was Ayyuthaya already a thing back then?
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-27 22:34:05 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
Woohoo! Can't wait for it :D
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-27 22:34:06 |

Tchaikovsky Reborn
Level 42
Report
|
question:
Weren't Nanjing and Beijing still massive cities during this time?
|
I have returned (Plus new map): 2016-05-27 22:51:35 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
Chengdu was a massive city back then (is still big up to this date; been huge since the three kingdoms era). But then again, into would fall into Song again... Song has pretty much all the goodies I know of.
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|