<< Back to Clans Forum   Search

Posts 21 - 40 of 49   <<Prev   1  2  3  Next >>   
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 05:14:31


knyte
Level 55
Report
Seems like that would be OP's best option if there's a genuinely strong connection between the two clans.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 06:44:04


Norman 
Level 58
Report
We have more members because we are recruiting very aggressively and also we should have less fluctuation. However our clan recruiting guidelines are to actively recruit players up to ladder rank 150 or corresponding skill level.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 07:57:17


AyanM 
Level 62
Report
@TeamGuns: what kind of dick are you talking about? if you are not mature enough, to understand some jokes/trolling/sarcasm so dont try to insult others.

What Nogals, Platinum and some others have started about Norman being a dick is comparable to nothing. Try to think different ways, not only one and wrong
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 09:33:47


Nogals
Level 58
Report
Really Ayan, you still defending him? If several people come to the same conclusion independently then you should understand that something is amiss. Different people aren't calling Norman a dick because they're in cahoots but because Norman is an arrogant stuck up troll. You can't take the effect and call it the cause.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 10:52:42


TeamGuns
Level 59
Report
@AyanM

An obviously wrong assumption. What is true however is that 101st, Hydra and C.O.R.P. are more welcoming than M'Hunters, as a strategic clan we don't accept players who pick 5 spots in ladder games.



That's a really uneeded answer to the post. And yes, he's been a dick here, and it isn't the first time I saw him doing something of the kind. So I'm pretty sure it's not me being immature and not getting a joke, because this is clearly not one.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 11:34:57


Norman 
Level 58
Report
I believe Nogals will use every opportunity now to attack me but whatever, rooting for him means rooting for the looser team.

@TeamGuns: I told the OP that he has no chance currently to get invited to M'Hunters while the other listed clans should probably take him. And I already explained our standards to Platinum in a mail.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 11:35:55


ZeroBlindDragon 
Level 60
Report
As a neutral observer, I did notice that Norman repeatedly made ridiculous claims without adding any supportive evidence.

There are as many 101st members in 1v1 Ladder Top 100 as M'Hunters (9). However, you have to consider that M'Hunters (71) have twice as many members as 101st (38). Isn't that proof that 101st has recruited players that can pick more than 5 territories in addition to having more depth as a whole?

Edited 4/26/2016 11:37:09
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 11:38:58


TeamGuns
Level 59
Report
Actually, we're 10 on the top 100, if you count Jinxed with an alt.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 12:50:22


(deleted) 
Level 62
Report
32 members in 101st now, The clan brought in a new system on how to deal with alts.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 12:59:11


Nogals
Level 58
Report
@Norman
Ayan randomly brought me into the conversation, do I not have a right to defend myself?
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 14:25:02


Norman 
Level 58
Report
@ZeroBlindDragon: You are a strange neutral observer and I'm not entirely sure what you think I would have claimed. If you are referring to me mentioning that M'Hunters has higher standards for joining then the other clans have their requirements on their clan page and a 40% requirement (assuming random opponents) should mean that you are cool with 5 ladder picks.

Edit: Since I'm home now and can see how the ladder looks like, let's take a better sample size than top 100 and instead use top 34.
- 101st: 0
- M'Hunters: 3 directly and when counting alts + unkanked players but with rating then 6 (now including fifi + SuperSmoove + jhk)

Edited 4/26/2016 18:37:57
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 14:30:31


Benjamin628 
Level 60
Report
Lol, Nogals (and others) built up a clan comparable to all clans mentioned here in a quarter of the time. NWO is the best clan to be in if you like only RT Games.
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 19:37:53


ZeroBlindDragon 
Level 60
Report
"What is true however is that 101st, Hydra and C.O.R.P. are more welcoming than M'Hunters, as a strategic clan we don't accept players who pick 5 spots in ladder games."

@Norman: This claim. I suppose you're not aware of 101st's prerequisites for joining? I suggest you take a look at their clan page.

Furthermore, you mentioned about recruiting the Top 100/150 in 1v1 Ladder, which is exactly why I specifically wrote "Top 100" in my previous post. If you want to play this comparison game, why not compare Top 15 by adding Lynx players in while we're at it? After all, Lynx members are also part of 101st.

Edited 4/26/2016 22:04:15
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 19:58:45


Norman 
Level 58
Report
If you want to play this comparison game[...]

No, I don't want to and you started with it. However 101st must have changed their recruitement requirements quite recently with now also requiring stuff like daily activity + ladder rank. A clan which only accepts active ladder players will quite naturally have a higher percentage of active ladder players in their rank. Of course daily activity + being constantly ranked in the ladder is unrealistic in the long term and the new 101st wouldn't accept most of Lynx players with their new requirements... but whatever, as long as they have fun.

Edited 4/26/2016 20:02:49
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 20:04:21


master of desaster 
Level 66
Report
Why does norman always argue about how good MH is or isn't? Also all others, nobody cares about ladder ranks or clan prerequisites! Think big! Think elitist!
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 20:44:27


Hades 
Level 64
Report
Didnt M'hunters come 3rd in division D1 after saying they'd win by a massive margin... lol
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 20:57:07


Norman 
Level 58
Report
Didnt M'hunters come 3rd in division D1 after saying they'd win by a massive margin... lol

It's possible that someone made such a statement however I don't remember it. Despite we probably didn't make such a statement I do like the attitude behind it. Clan league 7 was never intended by us to be more than a training plattform for some of our interested members. I'm organising the clan league 8 for our clan and this time our plan is indeed not to merely "win by a massive margin" but to to completely annihilate the other clans.

Edited 4/26/2016 20:59:22
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 21:11:40


The Dalek
Level 45
Report
Systems are set for MAXIMUM EXTERMINATION!
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 21:20:38


Nogals
Level 58
Report
Don't count your chickens before they hatch, Norman.

Also not telling Chris about your alts leads to disqualification. *cough* Dalek
Looking for a strategic clan: 2016-04-26 21:31:15


(deleted) 
Level 62
Report
I wish M'Hunters the best in D division in Clan League 8.

What I think one thing that is clearly different between M'Hunters and 101st is hunger and ambition. I believe personally what I've achieved with my recruits is the difference between the clans, The players I've recruited into 101st have been active, hungry and competitive. We are hungry for competition, We are hungry to improve and I think we've spent the most amount of time out of most clans in the whole of clan league discussing line-ups and possible combinations of team-mates etc. Which I hope will show in clan league.

M'Hunters no offense made with all the respect to their incredibly skilled players in my opinion doesn't hold enough hunger or ambition to make forward movements to the point where Norman makes this competition as a "training platform", If M'Hunters really wanted it they should've been out of D division and should be looking to get into B this season. I don't believe with M'Hunters it's a question if they can win it.. They clearly have players that can do it, People are viewing there group of players as "B" League level. It's there lack of interest in clan league or perhaps general interest in competing in competitions to do very well in. For Norman to say they are planning to "annihilate" the other clans in a League where it is basically a 2 clan league (M'Hunters + Hydra) with a outside shot of CORP sneaking in, It's just a joke, This should be expected off them easily.

I've been getting some impressions or signs this is some kind of 101st vs M'Hunters, My basic fundamental belief in Warlight is effort + personality + attitude is the greatest 3 traits you can have perhaps even more so then skill. I believe if we exclude Lynx and pretend the 101st clan with the same group of players with its recruitment rate at the moment in the long-term out pass M'Hunters. This was made for practice for clan league https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d-cxrzjBYDPH3j0sELSvh_rT0v-PSzuplFSco2mdnN8/edit#gid=0 where some of M'Hunters top top players didn't even show up, Yes maybe it's because they have lives and have other things on their mind or are busy. But 101st players had full participation and even had more to make a "B" Team. This is what the difference is between the two clans and is why in the long-term if the same player stay together which shouldn't due to the Lynx system, 101st should in time become strong and outpass M'Hunters.

This is in no way personal insults to M'Hunters, I'm simply speaking my mind and if taken as an insult should be taken as motivation ;)

Edited 4/26/2016 21:42:41
Posts 21 - 40 of 49   <<Prev   1  2  3  Next >>