Aww I'm sorry I thought you loved Ireland.
Considering
Polish people lived in Poland until they discovered Ireland.
Ie. Polish People are Immigrants.

POLISH MEMBER INSULTS IRELAND
REGL MEMBER INSULTS POLAND

We colonized Ireland, now its ours. Wheres the insult?

Yes X he is right don't shit stir. Congratz Quaddafi :) xD

Also Why am I a REGL member and he Polish? I can be REGL & Irish

I sincerely apologise for shit stirring.

1-Kala is a member, not a PR-Rep. so don't think he speaks for all of us.

2-Why do you people still make such a big deal of what country someone is born in?

3- Perrin For President!

Exactly. You can't control what country you were born in, but you can control whether you're a Member. That's why it's a much more meaningful way to categorize people. I'm sure there are plenty of good people here from plenty of countries. Members are just better.

Membership merely means that a person values the time and effort that Fizzer put into a project that has given them enjoyment worth equal to or greater then the value of the money required for membership...

the value that money has to each individual is related to each individuals incomes related to the price of said membership.. IE, someone making 150k USD a year would consider a 30$ lifetime membership less of a commitment/value then someone making 12k/year

and this value in no way indicates the skill said person has in said project, nor the integrity of said person.. thus judging people based on membership is fail.. I think the only reasonable thing to judge members on over non-members is the lower likelyhood of members being alternate accounts as opposed to non-members.. however that cannot be fully trusted neither, as again a person making 150k USD a year but sucks at said project wouldn't hesitate to spend 60$ for two accounts to make himself feel bigger then other people of which he has no real reason to feel bigger then...


/breath in

Members are NOT better because we are members. some of the better players choose to buy membership more often than worse players, because they tend to care more about the game. I will be the prime example of how members are not better than non-members

Members are people, who bought membership to feel important here. In fact, most of them are *.

i bought membership because i want to be able to change luck percentage when creating games, nothing more.

I am Polish and I have bought membership solely as a thank you gesture towards Fizzer ( all right, not solely - I was suspecting that he will move in future to monthly payments hence I've judged lifetime membership as a good investment ).

I have a nephew who is really good at programming even though he is only 15 - I've been helping him financially in various projects and I know a little how hard it is to start something like Warlight.

I love strategy games, seen, played many of them and Warlight is one of the most exiting projects and certainly the most bugfree one.Bravo Fizzer!

I live right now in Northern Ireland and because of that paying $30 is really not a problem to me. If I was still living in Poland I would have to refrain from becoming a member - it would be to costly.

I strongly disagree with bostonfred - members are not better, they are not elite , some even are not active. On the other hand everyone who becomes a member automatically earns a little extra respect from me for supporting this indie project with his money.

forgot:
Perrin for president!

I agree with almost everything the members have said so far, which pretty much proves my point.

bostonfred would you agree with following statement?

You can't control what country you were born in, but you can control whether you're a Harvard graduate. That's why it's a much more meaningful way to categorize people. I'm sure there are plenty of good people here from plenty of countries.Harvard graduates are just better.

An excellent question. (I probably could have predicted that by the M next to your name).

No. I know plenty of people who tried to get in to Harvard. Not all of them did.

I don't know anybody who tried to become a member, but were rejected. Some guys tried to win one by playing in a tourney here or there, but they still have the option to buy one.

i personally bought the membership because i have played this game for years now for free and i am thankful that Randy took as much time as he did to create it and feel its the least i can do to pay $30 for years of entertainment. I dont feel more important because of a silly membership in a game and i doubt anyone else does. you do realize that your complaints consistantly reveal you insecurities.

Guy says my sentiments..

I received well over 30$ worth of enjoyment before memberships were even implemented, and I for one was 'insisting' on him implementing a way for us to thank him for his time and effort.. so naturally I will pay when a membership system comes out, whether I use it's benefits or not.

bostonfred:
Thanks for the compliment.

Would you then describe those who tried to get to Harvard and got rejected as better, than those which never even tried, because they knew they could not afford it?
There are many people here which would like to be members, but can not afford it.

I think that making a priori assessments of people based on wealth is unfair, hurtful and unjustifiable.

This site is growing steadily and sooner or later we will have a member who is as controversial as Qaddafi.This person, lets call him Pol Pot, will take your statement that members are better and make use of it: treat non-members like garbage or worse. Do you really want that?