<< Back to Off-topic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 20 of 31   1  2  Next >>   
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 15:56:58


Ox
Level 58
Report
hehehe

Probably the most milked article of the year, but I have to shove it in you redneck and hyper-libertarian's faces.



Wow xD these guys really love this.

And it's true. Lololol.

Not only does it cost lives, but it turns each one of these toddlers into killers, and later in the lives when they realise what they actually did, it will haunt them forever.

Basically, get rid of yo guns.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 16:00:34


GeneralPE
Level 56
Report
Or not. I'd rather not give away my guns and let the Muslims come here unopposed and trample over us.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 16:10:03


Imperator
Level 53
Report
While we're at it let's get rid of Cars too. They kill a whopping 32,000 people per year in the US.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 16:11:53


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
Basically don't own a gun if you have a kid, or actually lock it away. No "getting rid" of gun won't work, it's impossible, the state is not god and can't do what ever it wants realistically.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 16:12:33


TeamGuns
Level 59
Report
I say we should ban all toddlers from comming to the US until we understand what is happening! We should also have a list of all toddlers so we can keep track of them and avoid these fuckers from killing us at will.

I believe that will solve the problem.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 17:10:29


Epicular
Level 46
Report
Or not. I'd rather not give away my guns and let the Muslims come here unopposed and trample over us.


ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 17:17:31


master of desaster 
Level 66
Report
KILL GUNS AND CARS!

EDIT: AND KIDS

Edited 5/13/2016 17:17:52
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 21:31:03


Darth Darth Binks
Level 56
Report
Let's not forget things we can fit in our mouths! Choking has caused thousands of deaths per year! There's only one way to guarantee that no one will choke and that is to make everything so big that we can't even fit it in our mouths.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 21:45:48


adrian waco
Level 31
Report
guns are specifically designed to kill things

u transport with a car

should there be limits on weapons that r intended to kill things

ya

dylan purchased a legal gun. he was granted his gun after a three day waiting period. they didn't have enough time to investigate whether he should have a gun or not. 3 days later and u get it automatically

Edited 5/13/2016 21:46:47
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 22:05:45


Ox
Level 58
Report
wow I agree with waco most! (and TG I guess, because it was obviously satire xD - it just sounds a lot funnier to say "i agree with waco the most" than "I agree with TeamGuns the most" because 1 you'd actually expect)

Edited 5/13/2016 22:06:14
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 22:48:23

Comrade Drunksky
Level 8
Report
Maybe it just boils down to proper gun safety education.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 22:52:03


Жұқтыру
Level 56
Report
I'm totally against guns, but banning or regulating them has just been shown time and time to practically none effect on murder rates. So if both the free and law way have the same outcome, then do the free way.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 23:25:20


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
Well don't tell that to your gun, it might cry.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-13 23:56:23


Ox
Level 58
Report
Plot twist: the schoolchildren are the shooters
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-14 04:06:36


Genghis 
Level 54
Report
What's more dangerous? Cancerous posters or terrorists?
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-14 04:17:56

[wolf]japan77
Level 57
Report
Basically don't own a gun if you have a kid, or actually lock it away. No "getting rid" of gun won't work, it's impossible, the state is not god and can't do what ever it wants realistically.
Japan, suck it b*tches, they actually managed to ban guns.

Secondly, we could actually replace cars, but Americans like there freedom too much, and are unwilling to pay for a nation-wide trains system, and secondly driver-less cars should resolve 90+% of crashes, as these are due to human error.

banning or regulating them has just been shown time and time to practically none effect on murder rates. So if both the free and law way have the same outcome, then do the free way.
On murder rates, sure. On accidental killing rates, which 75% of shootings in the us are, outlawing guns would reduce such a rate if you can actually ban them successfully(which should be possible, Japan did it).
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-14 04:26:39


Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
Japan banned them effectively when they started coming in, stop using it as a example for the US to follow.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-14 04:28:02


Empire of Kilos
Level 36
Report
If you care so little about you and your child's safety that you would leave a firearm within the grasp of a child. You deserve to be shot, all it does is show natural selection at work.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-14 04:37:09


Imperator
Level 53
Report
Japan, suck it b*tches, they actually managed to ban guns.


I always find it strange that Japan still manages to have so many suicides despite having practically no guns. To put this into perspective, around 3.4 out of every 100,000 people are murdered by guns in the US. In japan, 19.4 people per 100,000 commit suicide.

Secondly, we could actually replace cars, but Americans like there freedom too much, and are unwilling to pay for a nation-wide trains system, and secondly driver-less cars should resolve 90+% of crashes, as these are due to human error.


It's pretty dumb to try to replace cars with trains since we've already spent around 600 Billion dollars on the best highways in the world.
What's more dangerous: a toddler or a terrorist?: 2016-05-14 04:38:58

[wolf]japan77
Level 57
Report
Japan banned them effectively when they started coming in, stop using it as a example for the US to follow.

That's mostly false. Handguns were banned early on yes, but rifles were allowed until 1971, and that law is still being grandfathered in. As such, it would be possible to move forward with such a plan in the US, passing a law that required the turn in of guns once the owner dies by the heirs.

Edit: Here's how to get and keep a gun with ammo in japan.
first, you have to attend an all-day class and pass a written test, which are held only once per month. You also must take and pass a shooting range class. Then, head over to a hospital for a mental test and drug test (Japan is unusual in that potential gun owners must affirmatively prove their mental fitness), which you’ll file with the police. Finally, pass a rigorous background check for any criminal record or association with criminal or extremist groups, and you will be the proud new owner of your shotgun or air rifle. Just don’t forget to provide police with documentation on the specific location of the gun in your home, as well as the ammo, both of which must be locked and stored separately. And remember to have the police inspect the gun once per year and to re-take the class and exam every three years.

Edited 5/14/2016 04:41:05
Posts 1 - 20 of 31   1  2  Next >>