i have nothing against whites.

but what do you have against the Jews? ;)

You can, as long as you're not popular (same laws as in America).

Rest in Hell Cassius Clay

The American government has protected the rights of every single American

From what!? What the hell has been trying to invade and attack us for two hundred fucking years? What the hell is this invisible force that has been attacking us?

That's the thing, there has been no outside force attacking our rights, and the thing that has been attacking our rights is the fucking government you love. You can't do hundreds of things at this point without paying a fee for a license, you have no right to privacy, the Supreme Court has essentially made it legal for the police to go into your house for no fucking reason either than them just wanting to, you can be arrested for victimless "crimes" and fourty percent of your money is taken from you. What the hell was this stupid revolution patriots like you worship for, if the things that were that caused it are still fucking around?

Why don't you adopt X?

Edited 6/5/2016 00:28:55

Please adopt X, he lives by himself in a sewer in Minsk, and is regularly harassed by aliens. His only comforts are roaches, his seven limbed man-slave, and warlight.

You can adopt a Belarusian adult for only seven cents and a ruble, please, he doesn't have much time until he drinks himself into a early grave.

You are not adopting a full grown man, that can be put to work producing all the things Belarus produces, like dump trucks and apathetic nationalism, so don't call me dumb.

>implies someone can derail their own thread

This thread is like a trainwreck. It's destructive and horrible but yet you can't stop watching.

Sad day, Muhammed Ali was a great man, my sincere respects to him. I wish I was grown when he was still fighting, I would've definetly watched a couple of his boxing matches. A seriously great sport.


As for the others, if my country was a mad-megalomaniac-imperialistic one, like the US are, I'd seriously have a MSGB approach on it. I already strongly dislike many things Brazil and France did in the past.

Anyways, disliking a country doesn't mean you hate it, or want people living on it to die. As a matter of fact, stupid patriotism made more harm to america and americans than conscientious objectors and even soviet communism. Truly loving your country means that you won't stand by for a government that promoted a slaughtering of vietnamese to defend an economic system or slaughtered irakians to take oil. Any person that defends these actions is just one more alienated by Fox News and dumb for trusting politicians like Bush.

As for the others, if my country was a mad-megalomaniac-imperialistic one, like the US are, I'd seriously have a MSGB approach on it

Which country? France still does this. Brazil, well all you need is for them to get into a war with the tribals, then for Peru, Argentina, Bolvia, Chile, Venezuela to give them weapons. The Amazonian Jungle is already a awful place, now imagine tribals with RPGs, AK-47s, and IEDs taking out helicopters, roads and bridges, making it a unnavigable (more unnavigable) mess where thousands of Brazilian soldiers will meet their fates to insects alone, not counting the rest of nature and the tribals.

MSGB, why the fuck would Brazil attack tribals in amazonia? More importantly, why would the other SA countries arm them? Lol, and even then, There's barely a few dozen thousands left, hardly enough to turn the hole amazonian forest into a vietnamese style fuck-hole.

And before you argue against it, the amazon forest is way bigger than the vietnamese jungles, and vietnam had hundreds of thousand soldiers for a way smaller forest. Also, it's not like Brazilians even go there, if you take away a few cities and the regional capital of Manaos, the hole forest is barely empty of human presence.


As for France, yea, France still does a few international fuck ups, specially with our last president Sarkozy. But he's not in office anymore, and Hollande, even though not a great president either, hasn't pursued the policy of his conservative predecessor, and is instead getting fucked up by it (Middle east refugees, islamic extremism,...)

Btw, the only people killing indians today in Brazil are farmers and illegal loggers that want to take their lands. The government works against that (or at least tries), I doubt that an ancap system in Brazil would save these poor indians from them lol.

Edited 6/5/2016 02:26:12

Well, native militias are the answer. When they can stop more than 90% of the flow of loggers into an area, this only says that there should be more of them.

Right now, the only folk really interested in waging war in Somalia and killing Somalians are foreign statists, like the UN and Al-Qaeda. I don't see how a statist system will fix this.

I agree that an indian own defensive corp with oversight can do the job.

For Somalia, the problem is way more complicated, there's several war chieftains, a few states, piracy and a strong Al-Quaeda presence. I believe that the solution would be to give independence to the autodeclared states of the Somaliland and the Puntland (that are the facto states and work better than the somalian central state), and for Somalia itself keep the African Union forces, they're doing a good job at fighting the jihadists.

But that's just the solution in the military side, the country is going under a famine and people are starving. That can be put in the account of illegal fishing in the Somali coast, the government has no way to protect the local fishermen that have nothing to fish. A UN and western humanitary help would be good; better than just bombing the country as it's usually done.

For Somalia, the problem is way more complicated, there's several war chieftains, a few states, piracy and a strong Al-Quaeda presence

War chieftains that aren't powerful, Somiland and Puntland aren't really in Somalia at this point, the pirates are militias that defend the coasts, and I said there was an Al-Qaeda presence.

But that's just the solution in the military side, the country is going under a famine and people are starving. That can be put in the account of illegal fishing in the Somali coast, the government has no way to protect the local fishermen that have nothing to fish

Do you know who were protecting them before the US attacked? Themselves. Notice how waste dumping and fish stealing dropped noticeably when the Volunteer Coast Guard was active.

War chieftains aren´t powerful in a national scale, locally they can still kill you if you´re in their land lol... The problem also comes from the number of chieftains there is, a few hundreds. If they average 100 soldiers each, that´s 10000 men, enough to cause a lot of trouble huh?

Pirates aren´t militias, pirates are pirates.

I know you writed Al-Qaeda, I was just putting it as an unstability force they are lol


Yea, I kindda said that before the gvt falled apart there was less fish stealing. The fish is precisely stolen because there´s no one to prevent it.



About your pirate militias: http://www.saveourseafarers.com/somali-pirates-now-protecting-illegal-fishing-ships-says-un-report.html

They are only commited to make money, if they´re a militia protecting the people they don´t really act like one.

Rip black boxer #26679

MGSB, I really don't understand your obsession with militias. If you think military and police is evil, then you shouldn't be a fan of the militia concept either. A militia is pretty much just a military on smaller scale. It often operates as a military and structures itself like one. In addition, a militia even existing usually implies some sort of government or similar organization existing to back it up.