Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:12:21 |
Count Grishnackh
Level 17
Report
|
It has come to my attention that the ban system on WarLight is broken. The system should be reformed to optimize player experience.
-Separate bans There should be a separate ban from the game and on the forums. The whole point of a ban is to stop someone from doing whatever they were doing, because it was harmful. That harm might have been delivered on the forums, but not on the game, or vice versa. There's no point in banning someone from the whole game when harmful activity was isolated to one medium. This would increase activity, as someone who was banned on the forum would still be playing the game.
-Ban appeals There are countless instances when bans were unfair. There should be a ban appeals section on the forums where one can petition a ban to be revoked or reduced. Nothing should be final, opinions change, new evidence comes in. Ban reasons are subjective anyway.
-Clearly defining rule-violating behavior "Spamming the chat" is not against the rules according to the rules, but you can be banned for it. WTF? "Disrespect" is too broad and can be applied to almost anything. Players should be able to express some heavy emotions and criticism, too often this falls under the banner of "disrespect." Rules need to be better defined. Also, bans should spell out which rule was violated instead of quoting things you said.
-Eliminating favoritism This goes without saying, if every player is going to enjoy the site then players should stop being singled out for personal and political differences in bans. A close-knit group of players who are friends with the admins and don't get banned for ban-worthy behavior are toxic to the community. This tells players who think differently or aren't friends with those guys that they don't matter, and the rules become nothing. If only some players have to follow the rules then the rules are pretty much meaningless.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:24:18 |

Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
Increase them further. No question about that.
If anything, they are far too lenient! Though given the ease of making new accounts I can understand limiting them.
Edited 6/5/2016 20:25:03
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:25:14 |
Count Grishnackh
Level 17
Report
|
@ Fizzer
Irrelevant. I never asked to petition that particular ban, that was just me having some fun.
This post covers all bans in general. Fizzer himself uses ad hominem fallacies?
I'm no saint but the things I've outlined here are valid, my character doesn't invalidate them.
Edited 6/5/2016 20:25:49
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:27:40 |

GeneralPE
Level 56
Report
|
You deserve a suspension for the stuff Fizzer posted, but idk why they were relevant. I see no issue with the reforms you put forth. They would help in the case of something like Willy's bullcrap suspension.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:28:54 |

GeneralPE
Level 56
Report
|
Yeah he did post some pretty harsh language there
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:30:06 |
Count Grishnackh
Level 17
Report
|
You're derailing.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:37:51 |
[Wolf] Relmcheatham
Level 56
Report
|
@Prussian
Why can't there be separate bans? You didn't even refute his arguments you just did a character attack.
"Fizzer why are you so mad though?" ^ You said this right before you complained about him attacking someone's character, therefor an oxymoron.
Not addressing something is neither confirming or denying it. Assuming something is wrong or right based on someone not refuting it is even worse.
+1 Fizzer
Edited 6/5/2016 20:44:51
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:41:10 |
platypus
Level 54
Report
|
Prussian Monarchist, Smug Wojak. talking about age: Yesterday in the diplo, you completely saturated chat and made it unusable with your idiotic spamming of it. we didn´t even start the game by Castle bravo because of you. Don´t do it again. Too bad we didn´t start the game so everyone here could see what you were writing. Comeone man, don´t waste anyone´s time anymore.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:41:20 |

Genghis
Level 54
Report
|
I like these 2 new threads. They've really brought up an important issue. Never even noticed this before. Oh wait https://www.warlight.net/Forum/152918-timetoendthecuckolds-wherestheequaltreatmentCOME UP WITH ORIGINAL THREAD IDEAS, JEEZ...
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 20:56:36 |
[Wolf] Relmcheatham
Level 56
Report
|
@Prussian
Somebody can not be wrong for not addressing an issue and whether Fizzer did it intentionally or not for that purpose 1. matters little, and 2. is irrelevant to whether the issue is right or wrong.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 21:23:20 |

Genghis
Level 54
Report
|
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 23:15:23 |

Ox
Level 58
Report
|
There is very little favouritism, i've experienced. I've personally seen cases of people close to mods get warnings / the like. People are generally very quickly dealt with if they've broken a rule, especially a severe one like breaking rules on coins.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 23:17:53 |

Жұқтыру
Level 56
Report
|
+1 Fizzer
But often folk for no grounds at all are banned, like Jwilly and GeneralPE. Also, if we take into account about comments I made in bad taste and edited later, I'm definitely too badarse for this site. In addition, it might be nice to have some anti-spam mechanism for the mails (I got totally about 50 different marks from anonym).
Edited 6/5/2016 23:18:56
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 23:21:25 |

Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
Can't block him when he just mails from new level 1s every few days...
That is one strange person.
|
Ban system reform: 2016-06-05 23:21:50 |

Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
Good luck with that. His dexterous and strategic proxy alts will come for you. :P
I mailed Fizzer what may be a disastrous solution for his constant spam on me, but hey.
Also, damn, Fizzer went full savage xD #roasted
Edited 6/5/2016 23:22:24
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|