2vs2 ladder performance compared to 1vs1 ladder performance performance: 2011-06-29 05:50:22 |

Doushibag
Level 17
Report
|
Seeing Duke whine/acknowledge his loss of 1st place on the team ladder got me curious as to how people are doing relative to their individual 1v1 ladder performance and how the numbers stack up.
The X's mean the person is currently not on the ladder and unranked, but has a rating.
The ?'s mean the person is not on the ladder and does not have a rating.
Rank..Team Players................................Rating.1v1 Ranks...1v1 Ratings......Relative Performance
1....Blue Precision and Eitz.......................1896...016=07+09...3878=1953+1925...48.9%=1896/3878
2....Ruthless and Duke............................1868...021=17+04...3814=1804+2010...49.0%=1868/3814
3....Ragingpikey and NuckLuck..................1851...025=20+05...3742=1740+2002...49.5%=1851/3742
4....FBG-Dragons and FBG - Gaspumper......1810...XXX=XX+XX...3739=1854+1885...48.4%=1810/3739
5....TeddyFSB and samurai.......................1707...025=12+13...3735=1869+1866...45.7%=1707/3735
6....Alcarmacil and MathWolf.....................1698...066=40+22...3203=1470+1733...53.0%=1698/3203
7....Mike and Tor....................................1675...???=??+37...????=????+1494.....??.?%=1675/????
8....[WM] Red and [WM] Dazed & Insane.....1653...054=31+23...3285=1558+1727...50.3%=1653/3285
9....Guderian and CuChulainn.....................1454...???=??+45...????=????+1404.....??.?%=1454/????
10...thekohser and ТиТо...........................1376...072=38+34...3009=1493+1516...45.7%=1376/3009
11...FBG_Tick and FBG-randall146...............1360...XXX=50+XX...2641=1330+1311...51.5%=1360/2641
12...Perrin3088 and crafty35a....................1322...049=21+28...3334=1734+1600...39.7%=1322/3334
13...[REGL] majokun and [REGL] *BLAST*.........1298...119=55+64...2390=1290+1100...54.3%=1298/2390
14...Aerial Assault and FBG - This Guy.........1167...XXX=54+XX...2754=1291+1463...42.4%=1167/2754
=======================================================================================
If I insert people into the 1v1 ladder based on their rating this is the result:
The ladder updated while I was doing this and don't feel like updating everything, so this part will be slightly off.
Rank..Team Players................................Rating.1v1 Ranks...1v1 Ratings......Relative Performance
1....Blue Precision and Eitz.......................1896...016=07+09...3878=1953+1925...48.9%=1896/3878
2....Ruthless and Duke............................1868...023=19+04...3814=1804+2010...49.0%=1868/3814
3....Ragingpikey and NuckLuck..................1851...027=22+05...3742=1740+2002...49.5%=1851/3742
4....FBG-Dragons and FBG - Gaspumper......1810...027=15+12...3739=1854+1885...48.4%=1810/3739
5....TeddyFSB and samurai.......................1707...027=13+14...3735=1869+1866...45.7%=1707/3735
6....Alcarmacil and MathWolf....................1698...066=42+24...3203=1470+1733...53.0%=1698/3203
7....Mike and Tor....................................1675...???=??+39...????=????+1494......??.?%=1675/????
8....[WM] Red and [WM] Dazed & Insane....1653...058=33+25...3285=1558+1727...50.3%=1653/3285
9....Guderian and CuChulainn....................1454...???=??+48...????=????+1404......??.?%=1454/????
10...thekohser and ТиТо..........................1376...076=40+36...3009=1493+1516...45.7%=1376/3009
11...FBG_Tick and FBG-randall146..............1360...109=53+56...2641=1330+1311...51.5%=1360/2641
12...Perrin3088 and crafty35a...................1322...053=23+30...3334=1734+1600...39.7%=1322/3334
13...[REGL] majokun and [REGL] *BLAST*.......1298...127=59+68...2390=1290+1100...54.3%=1298/2390
14...Aerial Assault and FBG - This Guy........1167...101=58+43...2754=1291+1463...42.4%=1167/2754
What I found interesting was that for the top 6 teams on the 2v2 ladder, their rank is accurately predicted by the total of their individual ratings. You could say the % for relative performance is how they did in relation to how you might expect them to do based on their individual ratings. Thought it might act sort of as an indicator for how well the two people do as a team versus individually.
Sorry the tables aren't more readable. Getting information aligned here is a beast and I don't know of a better way to do it. Even with preview it took a lot of effort. Without preview that would have come out jacked all to hell, heavily misaligned.
|
2vs2 ladder performance compared to 1vs1 ladder performance performance: 2011-06-29 06:05:05 |
Eitz
Level 11
Report
|
Those are some crazy stats Doushi, interesting...
|
2vs2 ladder performance compared to 1vs1 ladder performance performance: 2011-06-29 06:55:36 |

Doushibag
Level 17
Report
|
Ah, thanks Fizzer, that looks much better.
|
2vs2 ladder performance compared to 1vs1 ladder performance performance: 2011-06-29 14:36:38 |

Ruthless
Level 57
Report
|
wow, that's really cool. So basically, find the highest rated 1v1 player you can and be their partner for 2v2.
1v1 strength does transfer over to the team games fairly accurately in this small subset.
|
2vs2 ladder performance compared to 1vs1 ladder performance performance: 2011-06-29 16:32:13 |

Duke
Level 5
Report
|
I wasn't whining...
I thought a 40+ point jump for beating a team with a 1450 rating was bizarre.
R and I were expecting to give up 1st place in the next couple of weeks as we've fallen behind in our open games and Nuck was right behind us. BP and E's leapfrog was a surprise.
The congrats were definitely a bit halfhearted. They will be more heartfelt when Nuck passes us.
|
2vs2 ladder performance compared to 1vs1 ladder performance performance: 2011-06-29 16:35:32 |

Duke
Level 5
Report
|
The chart results are interesting - Thx Doushi. Perrin and Crafty at 1322 is ridiculous.
I was also contemplating individual versus team performance today, but found the highest rating achieved to be a more reliable indicator. It factors out those who gave up. I wonder if the correlation will be closer that way.
|