https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WUVP6l9Das

Watch it. Love Trump. Donald J Trump is going to be the next president of the US of A.

I AM the #TrumpTrain!

im on the #TrumpTrainCuzIdontWantHillary4PresidentTrain

More beautiful viewing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyPkshnIiyc

#TRUMPTRAIN

"I will strengthen our military"

How am I supposed to love him when he says bad things like this?

Most of it is pointing out the flaws in America and promising stuff he can't achieve like "I'll make Mexico pay for the wall".

And "I am the least racist person you have ever met", which is a flat-out lie.

He's disgusting. He's said that he would kill innocent women and children in Syria, and he'd execute Muslims with bullets dipped in pigs' blood. Abhorrent.

Yeah, but he hasn't actually done abhorrent things, like , you know, Clinton, Obama and Bush. He hasn't been the source of this world's problems in the way the establishment of the US government had been, and isn't nearly the same threat as they are.

Ox, your morals are questionable when you support Clinton/Obama. The ideology they perpetuate is quite possibly the most dangerous one facing the world now, and while Trump's isn't much better, that doesn't justify supporting Clinton.

And when I say that the ideology that the Clinton's, Bushes and Obama perpetuate is the most dangerous one currently, don't think I am over exaggerating. The revolution in Libya, that was supported and succeeded because of NATO has killed over ten thousand folk. The Syrian civil war has killed hundreds of thousands of folk. The Iraq conflict has killed over a million folk. The occupation of Afghanistan has killed hundreds of thousands of folk. These are only a few NATO/US sponsored conflicts in the 21st century, and they have killed most defintely over a million folk, and these aren't even all of them, and this is the start of a century of this. And quite possibly the worst thing with these, is that they solved no problems and created more.

No.
He has horrible ideas for foreign policy:
-Giving nukes to South Korea (We don't need India-Pakistan levels of tensions)
-Building a wall (just look at China, Byzantium, Berlin and Gaza strip and guess where it is going to end up)
-Building up the military (as it apparently wasn't big enough...)

He has horrible plans for healthcare:
-Doesn't require children to be vaccinated (his reason is because of autism. And to think Chris Christie was the only presidential candidate who was so dumb to think this).

Bad social plans:
-Against putting women in the military
-Against legalization of same-sex marriage (Why?)

Bad immigration plans
-selective immigration (make a guess on why people would not support this)
-For requring immigrants to learn English (If a man is allowed to freely speak his thoughts, why stop him from speaking those thoughts in a foreign language?)

Other bad policies:
-Continue surveillence of allies

So no, I am not on the Trump Train, and I will not be voting for Fox News this November.

and I will not be voting for Fox News this

So you're voting for Trump?

:p

Here is the link: https://www.warlight.net/Forum/159666-tuna-industry-japan

Irrelevant spam.

Irrelevant spam that will get reported

Yeah, but he hasn't actually done abhorrent things, like , you know, Clinton, Obama and Bush. He hasn't been the source of this world's problems in the way the establishment of the US government had been, and isn't nearly the same threat as they are.

Ox, your morals are questionable when you support Clinton/Obama. The ideology they perpetuate is quite possibly the most dangerous one facing the world now, and while Trump's isn't much better, that doesn't justify supporting Clinton.

The past means nothing, why do folk keep bringing it up? When folk are president, they're different. Its truth is, though, that Trump lies (or is wrong) loads more than Clinton and Sanders, and he plans on making America far more authoritarian and hazardous than what those two want at all.

And Ox does not support Obama's or Clinton's wars. You've no reason at all to believe that Donald Trump would for some grounds be better as a politician than they were, especially when he says things like "Islam hates us", or that China invented the global warming hoax to weaken America's industry. I mean, you can believe, as a scientist, based on what's been seen, that mankind does not make global warming much worse - but no environmentalist or anyone who knows what they're talking about full-out denies global warming.

Clinton is falsely bold, but most of the things she says are more or less true. While Sanders, the worst he's done is said a few things that are in the ballpark of rightness, such as "Whites don't know what it's like to be poor." (as they are a wealthier demograph), or that "not one Republican has the guts" to admit climate change (there are many, that's a bit unfair).

It seems Trump is good at the oneliners but speaks rather with repetition and doesn't go into the details. And finally, a wall wouldn't fix immigration and your gouverment budget.

Edited 6/10/2016 21:27:02

The past means nothing, why do folk keep bringing it up? When folk are president, they're different

Ok, I'll assume that the person who supported nearly every intervention in modern American history and started several interventions recently won't do so again as president. Also, I guess Lukashenko is going to let elections not be rigged soon.

And Ox does not support Obama's or Clinton's wars.

He supports Obama and Clinton. You don't get to pick and choose when supporting a leader, you just get that leader, and that leader's choices have very big effects.

You've no reason at all to believe that Donald Trump would for some grounds be better as a politician than they were,

I'm not saying he would be better, I'm saying that Clinton is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, and she shouldn't be president.

Clinton is falsely bold, but most of the things she says are more or less true

She's under investigation by the FBI. To be fair though, the FBI is the American version of the KGB, so it might be a directed political attack based on little evidence, though that's a little far-fetched.

Ok, I'll assume that the person who supported nearly every intervention in modern American history and started several interventions recently won't do so again as president. Also, I guess Lukashenko is going to let elections not be rigged soon.

He supports Obama and Clinton. You don't get to pick and choose when supporting a leader, you just get that leader, and that leader's choices have very big effects.

I'm not saying he would be better, I'm saying that Clinton is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, and she shouldn't be president.

He's Scottish, and out of all the folk he can pick to support, he picks Obama and Sanders more than Clinton, and I really doubt that he will say that he does support them anyway.

The truth of the matter is, Trump says he's going to raise military spending and upscale the Mashriq War and the human rights abuses as official policy, while Clinton had said this to lesser amount (except for the human rights abuses).

She shouldn't be president, but the vote shouldn't be rigged. But these are fantasies.

She's under investigation by the FBI. To be fair though, the FBI is the American version of the KGB, so it might be a directed political attack based on little evidence, though that's a little far-fetched.

Under investigation for a small felony.

She put high up intel on a easy to access server, that's not a small felony.

And X, with politicians lying so much, shouldn't actions be the primary thing that we judge them on?

shouldn't actions be the primary thing that we judge them on?

By that measure, Trump is unmeasurable.

She put high up intel on a easy to access server, that's not a small felony.

Wait, so if Clinton does this, she's evil, but if Snowden does it, he's a hero and true patriot?

No, Snowden actually exposed bad stuff. Clinton put stuff concerning things that could be passwords for nuclear plants to nuclear launch codes, she didn't expose anything bad, she just didn't protect things that should be protected.

^ +1

I'm on the laugh train. Happens at least once a week. I just stop and think, Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee. And start laughing out loud. Not a candidate, the nominee. Forever, his name will be on that short list. Fucking hilarious.

If he had any chance of winning the general election, I'd be scared. But he doesn't. So it's just really, really funny.

Edited 6/11/2016 21:16:53

So you're ready for Hillary, that enabler of a glorified rapist whose only selling point is her old and musty vagina.

Oh I'm so sorry, I shouldn't speak ill of madam secretary, that makes me a sexist pig.

Edited 6/11/2016 21:25:27