| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-30 19:08:53 |
Leibstandarte (Vengeance)
Level 45
Report
|
100,000 Regular Armed U.S.A Marines
100 Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey
20 M1 Abrams
100 Grizzly APCs
300 Towed Artillery
vs
3,000,000 Poorly armed and trained Chinese soldiers (They have plently of RPGs don't worry)
550 Some shitty ass tank that would break down with a touch.
Terrain: A flat grassland but the US base is at the top of the hill
Situation: USA Army knows the enemy is coming and has 48 hours to prepare
Ammunition: USA has plenty of them along with other field equipment to make defences ''barbed wire, sand bags etc). Chinese have an AK-47 with 2 clips per person, no extra ammo.
Information: Chinese side knows the capability of the US Army but the US Army does not.
Fight to the bitter end.
Who wins?
Edited 7/30/2016 19:11:05
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-30 19:11:00 |
Huitzilopochtli 
Level 57
Report
|
the russians
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-30 19:34:02 |
DomCobb
Level 46
Report
|
Ghandi with his benevolent nukes would liberate both countries from their violent oppressors.
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-30 20:11:23 |
[TNW] Commander Vimes
Level 37
Report
|
I would, of course
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-30 20:14:25 |
Zephyrum
Level 60
Report
|
The world wins. Every political defeat for the world superpower is a political victory for every country not directly aligned with them.
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-30 21:05:15 |
Leibstandarte (Vengeance)
Level 45
Report
|
^ Only answer i got.
Guys pls stahp!
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 02:27:14 |
#TrumpTrain
Level 19
Report
|
usa would win and it would go down in history like da greek victory vs persia
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 08:57:46 |
francisco0002
Level 49
Report
|
one US soldier is able to kill 100 crappy chinese soldiers. Remember kids, quality > quantity. It happened many times throughout history. e.g. greece vs persia, germany vs soviets, wallachia vs ottomans, rome vs not-rome, crusades, etc.
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 09:03:45 |
Major General Smedley Butler
Level 51
Report
|
But one of the reasons Rome was so able to fight other countries is because of their organizational system, which allowed them to get more soldiers for less cost. And the Ottomans took the Balkans, and much of Hungary and Romania with their huge eastern army. And the Crusades were failures.
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 10:23:43 |
Pulsey
Level 56
Report
|
3 million versus 100 thousand on a flat field?
Forget the tanks and RPGs, I would just get them all to charge at you simultaneously. ;D
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 12:11:10 |
Trumps Wall
Level 8
Report
|
Amen trump train
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 12:11:11 |
Trumps Wall
Level 8
Report
|
Amen trump train
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 13:41:46 |
francisco0002
Level 49
Report
|
Some of the crusades succeeded. And Romania and Hungary managed to win many battles while being outnumbered by the turks. It's true that the Roman organisation system was helpful but it was mainly their highly trained commanders and soldiers that won
|
| A dumb but entertaining question.: 2016-07-31 18:11:27 |
Leibstandarte (Vengeance)
Level 45
Report
|
US Army is on the top of a hill, chinese is on the flatland and has to climb.
EDIT: It's a big hill that is able to hold 200,000 personnel at most but not so big in terms of height.
Edited 7/31/2016 18:12:16
|
