If you only came here for the link and not the commentary then here it is.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/communist-party-unites-behind-hillary/

Lets wind the clocks back a year to July 30th, 2015.

Trump was mocked as being a long shot all the while eating up whole news cycles of coverage, spreading his message of anti-illegal immigrant populism. Bernie was a new phenomenon drawing 100,000+ crowds to hear his message of Karl Marx and the country was still reeling from the death of Sandra Bland in Police custody.

Chris Mathews invited the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, to his program to discuss the role of this emerging star, Bernie Sanders in the Democrat party.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHpiMv3Sy8Q&feature=youtu.be&t=57s

When Chris Mathews asks Debbie straight up, "What is the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?", you can almost see Debbie struggle to not stutter her way through a personal attack which, at this point in her life, has become second nature whenever any honest question is asked.

The reason she deflected and deflected like a politician in a sex scandal is because Chris Mathews is an icon of liberalism and his viewers won't be swayed with a trigger word like "racist, misogynist, womanizer, Islamophobe, homophobe, ect."

The media picked up on this story immediately and most well versed political circles were discussing the same question posed to the head of the DNC. Debbie was invited on other shows but when the question came up she continued to deflect and nobody ever got to the bottom of where the current democrat party stands with regard to Fabian Socialism.

One year later it seems the question has been put into a clearer context if not answered all together. While Socialism derives from the Fabian society and Communism derives from Karl Marx, two significantly different schools of thought with significantly different methods, their goals are strikingly similiar.
In particular, the Communist Party USA is much less in line with Karl Marx and more in line with Fabian Socialism when their ideology is analyzed.

Today, the American Democratic party becomes a haven for socialists and the foe Capitalism and meritocracy. This revelation that Fabian Socialists, including Bernie Sanders, have put their support behind Hillary Clinton may pleasure some of you and enrage others. I ask that you keep in clean.

I could address the unlikeliness of Clinton rejecting their endorsement or address the pros and cons of a socialist society or dig deeper into how the Democratic party got so far off the deep end but those are stories for another day.

Today, I want to ask you, the community, "What do you think the difference between a democrat and a socialist is?" and "Do you think the American Democratic Party has moved too far to the left on economic issues?"

Edited 8/8/2016 05:32:05

"What do you think the difference between a democrat and a socialist is?"

None

"Do you think the American Democratic Party has moved too far to the left on economic issues?"

Both the republicans and democrats have

A democrat, by its meaning, is someone who wants folkdom, while a socialist, (having many meanings), wants (more) government controle over "the means for making", as they're called. They aren't incompatible.

I don't really know the answer to the next frain, it hangs on how rightist the fellow you ask is. In my personal thought, yes, though, and the Good Old Party has, too.

I think you are exaggerating how left the Democratic Party actually is though.

of course the communist party wants clinton to win, they have a lot in common. eg. they both
- want to take our guns away
- take control of the people
- get rid of free speech
- raise taxes on rich and middle class
- anti-business
- large amounts of welfare
and the list goes on

- raise taxes on rich and middle class

Prove it.

The clip Trump uses to say Clinton's raising taxes on the middle class actually has Clinton saying "we aren't going to raise taxes on the middle class" but captioned as "we are going to raise taxes on the middle class."

Anyhow, this is common for the CPUSA. They don't have a national shot, so they usually back some party with one. This is why they keep getting called revisionists and ditched for parties like Socialist Alternative.

It's also odd to see left-wingers attack the Dems by calling them "neo-liberals" and asking what the difference is between them and the GOP, while right-wingers call Dems "socialists" and ask what the difference is between them and CPUSA.

Both of them are right in the crazy world where we look at talking points instead of policies, analysis, and facts. AKA the world of OT forum posts.

CP USA is 100% more harmful than KKK. Trump wins again

I find it more interesting that the head of the American Nazi Party has endorsed Trump.

I wonder if the guy realizes that he is likely driving more votes to Clinton by his doing so. It would seem more effective for such obviously unliked and widely maligned organizations to either withhold their endorsements or direct them to their actual opposition. The best thing he could have done for Trump would have been to speak out against the man!

Socialists would prefer the poor were poorer so long as the rich were poorer rather than the poor being richer whilst the rich were richer with the gap between the two were larger.

That's the reason why socialism doesn't work.

Nazis are better than Commies, Dick, commies killed way more.

Also +1 Colonel exactly

Edited 8/8/2016 15:37:30

If that's how you judge which one's better than this, that or the other, then I don't see why anyone should listen to you.

Socialists would prefer the poor were poorer

lol

@General: The Nazis were welcomed when they liberated Ukraine, Croatia, Belarus and the Baltics from Stalinist oppression. When the Commies came back, they just killed everyone for supporting Hitler.

If that's how you judge which one's better than this, that or the other, then I don't see why anyone should listen to you.

Socialists would prefer the poor were poorer

lol

You're obviously delusional. Read my whole sentence, rather than extracting phrases you know are out of context and misrepresented.

simple question a typical democrat is someone who wants socialist ideas within a capitalist society. A socialist is someone who wants a socialist society and break up with the capitalist society.

I strongly dislike communists. *Struggles to not trash talk*

Donald Trump is using President Obama's 2008 ads that attacked Hillary Clinton, in an attempt to undermine the fact that Obama now supports Clinton, saying the best of things for her now. It's pretty funny, actually.

The Nazis were welcomed when they liberated Ukraine, Croatia, Belarus and the Baltics from Stalinist oppression. When the Commies came back, they just killed everyone for supporting Hitler.


Lol no, that's what they would have done, only the Nazis killed them all for being untermensch

One, please use italics, quotes or "s, two, a lot of folk did celebrate, but the Nazis, as they were Nazis, committed lots of atrocities against them and screwed that up.

That's what I said.

lol u twats are reading into this CP endorsement thing way 2 srsly

it a no name party

no1 cares about it

has no influence

communism died

cold war over

get over it mm

just like no1 cares about the american nazi party tht endorsed trump

Edited 8/11/2016 10:07:24