total chaos would ensue

Why? Why would chaos ensue? My system would be implemented after about a hundred years of minarchy, transferring state-done things over to private companies, and ending with a cessation of taxation. There would be no sudden lack of policing if that's what you're concerned about. In general most services would be provided more efficiently. There would be no other state to invade Ancapistan; the system would be implemented globally.

Stop being an idiot, if private companies are in charge of giving services, they become the leaders of the region in which they supply those services.

Stop being an idiot, if they use the power they have in a high percent efficiency monopoly to the detriment of people buying their products, those people will stop buying their products and go to another company.

They will form new nations with CEO's at the head instead of a president, dictator, etc.

How exactly would they form a nation? There won't be mercenaries, weaponry wouldn't be kept for one group, and they don't have any sort of useful monopoly in this situation.

humans are meant to work in packs, not alone.

This is a irrelevant statement that has no bearing on this argument. Folk are not splitting up to small homes by themselves for years on end, they are not going to disband society, they're just going to get coercion out of society.

You reject basic science due to the fact that you belong to a religion which rejects basic human rights and any sort of Western beliefs, that's a fact.


Paugers stop talking to yourself, and nazism isn't a religion.

Or if these companies set up mercenary forces they can simply stop people from leaving their controlled area?

There are no mercenaries when this system starts; the companies would have to recruit from the population, equip them, and supply them. This is too large a task for companies, and would sink them in profits as other companies invest in ways to increase efficiency.

If there are no governing laws to stop them or any sort of police force to avoid these situations, what is to stop them from setting up arms monopolies?

There are police; private police. And monopolies would collapse as the incentive to lower prices would be too much, and one break in the cartel causes the entire cartel to falter.

Nice assertion, any arguments?

LOL !!
*roasted
xd
kek

Genghis

Allaah is GREATEST!

I think all peoples should be able to attempt independence for themselves.

However, they must understand the consequences of doing so. Scotland leaving the UK, for example, would cripple both nations. Neither could survive unless they united.
I think it's fine for you to feel ethnic and national pride. However, exaggeration of one's national achievements and devaluing the achievements of others leads to the ugliness of supremacy.

If the Basques want to be free, let them, but they must make sure they understand the consequences of becoming independent.

Perhaps having autonomy inside nations for ethnic groups can be a start, such as the Russian republics, autonomous regions for ethnic groups like Tatars, Alans, Chechens, Yakuts, etc.

Oh yeah, and 1416/squiggles, you're illogical, fundamentalist, and delusional. Must be the desert heat.

Only heyheuheism is logical and nondelusional. All else is false.

Let's say MGSB's ideology is put in effect. All is good and well. Then qround 100 people get sick of it and form a state, be it Kingdom, Republic etc. then what? Do companies invade it and raze the settlement? If so then your system is horrible. If not, then your system cannot operate and it's just a dream

I'm saying being a Muslim's illogical, but you are 1416

From what I've gathered, you're similar to this Paugers, but Muslim instead of Christian. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm right. Honestly, I don't care.

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQzkTPVrnWHKGHfHX21zgGqpACzo4-0qJfYlkEqqc8ZPT7ocDIDgGX4p6fE



Does this look white or am i colorblind? First picture to pop-up after i searched ''Riffian people''

@Tabby,

I never said that culture and ethnicity were the same thing. Culture and ethnicity do correspond with each other but they are not the same thing. An individual can change their culture but cannot change their ethnicity

No matter how much you oppose ethnicity, it will still exist. There are some things that no one can change

His movement is based on culture, not ancestry. If we changed the situations of ''white'' and ''black'' people then ''black'' people would be superior.

EXAMPLE: Like ''black'' europeans enslaving ''white'' africans. Even thinking about this made me lol.

Edited 8/23/2016 09:14:16

Just came to chip in seeing that I'm half Basque on my mothers side, the Basque people do not want independence they get plenty of economic freedom and most of them have houses in La Rioja and Burgos that they head down to in the summer and weekends. I would have supported Basque independence under Franco but the people are nowhere near oppressed and great strides are being taken in order to revitalise the language. Overall what the Basques actually want is political prisoners back, their language to survive, and then of course cheese and patxaran.

^