<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 10 of 10   
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-12 02:34:11

fdas
Level 57
Report
Should sanctioning someone count as an attack.
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-12 02:41:50


[FCC] CBerkley10
Level 51
Report
It truly is just what the host thinks, its all personal preference. If the sanction is huge and hurts a lot, I would say yes, but if it is small over a duration of a couple turns, I would say no.
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-13 16:13:19


ViralGoat 
Level 60
Report
hell yes
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-13 19:19:59


[REGL] Pooh 
Level 62
Report
If its negative, then no.
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-13 19:59:47


gilead k'nights
Level 41
Report
It's like a country sending in a spy. It's only an act of war if you get caught and it's only a blatant act of war if everybody knows about it.

It sounds like somebody ninja'd you. lol
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-14 00:20:49

fdas
Level 57
Report
Everyone knew about it. Does that make it a blatant act of war?
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-14 00:35:44


gilead k'nights
Level 41
Report
In my limited experience I would say that depends on the diplo.
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-14 02:06:59

E Masterpierround
Level 58
Report
I would say that even if it isn't a declaration of war it is very clear casus belli.
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-14 08:35:25

Ambasador
Level 55
Report
I think that a host who decides to allow sanctions in a diplo game (which really messes up the gameplay in my humble opinion), should specify it.
Sanction cards as diplos: 2016-10-14 11:01:59


Dutch Desire 
Level 60
Report
EU sanctioning Russia dousen't count as an attack, so why would it count as an attack in a diplo?

Edit: thx Pooh I dident know negative sections was posible, that is way more convinent in diplo's.

Edited 10/14/2016 11:08:25
Posts 1 - 10 of 10