Jews are intelligent, but so are whites. Whites are simply more generous and trustworthy.

But if Jews control Whites, then Jews must be more intelligent than Whites.

Here's some of Paugers teachings, it's truly insightful. It comes from the archives in these chats

https://discord.gg/Qt5bgr4;
https://discord.gg/HEcC6KE

And there's likely some great ones I missed, but it's good.

PAUGERS'S WISE WORDS
-"I don't want to make statements that potentially could be used against me"

-"Liberty was developed by the white race."
-"Hitler didn't hate" (yes this is the full sentence)
-"I'm not a fan of Catholicism"
-"The destruction of gender concerns me"
-"I'm a national socialist, not a Nazi"
-"They [East Asians] act like ants"
-"Negros need enslavement"
-"Apartheid was amazing"
-"I don't know why He [God] put Jesus in Israel and not Germany. I can only hope to please Him."
-"The concept of a nation is too complex for negros"
-"I'm not a Muslim."
-"[My mum's] behavior is embarrassing to herself and me"
-"I've argued the Holocaust with [my mum's boyfriend]. He was triggered. He's an idiot though so I destroyed him."
-"Are you a member of my Volk King Bradford?"
-"Americans do not exist"
-"Cata is less German than I"

Edited 10/14/2016 18:49:28

>Democratic party run by Jews
>Chose Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders

i kek every time

“We have a responsibility to lift each other up. As we Methodists like to say, do all the good you can to all the people you can in all the ways you can,”

- Clinton

>karl
>expecting a rational argument
topkeklmao

How is this not front page news in every single news publication, rather than an alleged plot by the Russian government to throw the election.

This is actual election rigging by a leading candidate.

Edited 10/14/2016 20:23:57

I was going to get worried about a second, third, fourth, ect, term from Clinton but I realized she's unlikely to survive this one let alone the next.

Yes, because the elimination of the over 3 billion non-Aryans and still being able to create a perfect theocratic monarchy which runs smoothly on a racial caste system to eliminate any non-white signs of existence is totally realistic and possible. Would be pulled off without a hitch.

And in your own profile, you have a link to a book attacking Jews for many major calamities, and your bio is and i quote:
I am a theocratic imperialist monarchist who is fascist economically.

So no, I am not strawmanning, or making generalizations, nor am I using an ad hominem. I am using facts.

So I suggest using your above-average flawless white mind, pure of JIDF corruption, to reply honestly and without any "keks" or dismissive comments. Because in that case you're not even willing to defend your point against a Jew, a naturally inferior subhuman autistic race.

Edited 10/14/2016 21:42:01

Downvoted all off-topic, de-railing comments, unrelated to the OP. If everyone reading this did the same, the conversation could continue.

None of those leaked mails will really matter in the end.

This reminds me of the 2002 French presidential election. Taken from Wikipedia:

The choice between Chirac, who was under suspicion for actions carried out whilst he was mayor of Paris but benefited from Presidential immunity as long as he stayed president, and Le Pen, a nationalist often accused of racism and antisemitism, was one that many found tough. [...] In the days before the second ballot, a memorable poster was put up of Chirac with the slogan "Vote for the Crook, not the Fascist". Chirac defeated Le Pen by a landslide.

I believe Hillary Clinton will win, not because her voters genuinely want her in, but because they don't want Trump in.

I was going to get worried about a second, third, fourth, ect, term from Clinton but I realized she's unlikely to survive this one let alone the next.


She's already recovered from Pneumonia in like 8 hours (at age 70) so I'm pretty sure she can survive death.

*roasted*
LOL !!
xd
kek

rekt
kil
ded
destoryed

^
Conversations evolve, don't be a cuck and say "WELL IT'S NOT WHAT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT"

I follow Fizzer's own guidelines which are (see the [?] thing under the thumbs):

You should upvote or downvote based on whether you think the general WarLight community would find the content of this post interesting, enjoyable, or useful. Be careful not to let your own prejudices affect your voting.

In the context of the OP, I expect that most of the general WL community will find derails about Jews neither interesting, nor enjoyable, nor useful. Make another post if you want to talk about that stuff. (I doubt it will stay visible for long, though, if previous threads are any measure.)

>vegetarian
>callings eating chicken sucking cock
>mewlmao

Edited 10/15/2016 02:16:55

Fine Karl.

I will read Imperium. end to end.

This whole convo became garbage after page 1

" Come on, this was a time when alcohol was banned and when democrats supported segregation. "Historically" literally has no relevance when discussing long-term issues like this. "

1 All parties supported it at that time. 2 Hoover had actually a pretty interesting dry stance. 3, did you honestly just say that long term issues have no relation to history?. Well, I'm not gonna start screaming at you but I will have to say I respectfully disagree. History has everything to do with this. In order to understand how to solve a problem or understand an issue, you must know its origins. Besides, when I said that I was correcting Juq not talking about the current subject you were on.

History has everything to do with this.

I was referring to your claim about historical party stances, not about history in general. There is widespread agreement among political scientists that the republican and democratic party platforms have drastically changed since the 1920's, one example of this being trade.

Edited 10/20/2016 18:30:51