BTW, I'm not familiarized with all the templates, there ara any with special sttings like multy-day, no-split, local-dep, commanders...despite the ones that have it on the name?

can u add a ladder (4 ppl like me) that is like level 15-55 or what ever u want?

@Radoverlord, he cant, because most of the templates/maps open on high levels

oh, I thought you can play on high level maps but just not create the games... do I have to create my games? did I miss something? or am can I just not play with those settings?

From the first page:

Question = I'm missing something. If the games are created from your account, why does the partaker need to have everything unlocked?

Answer = Because of the way Warlight APIs work. I cannot invite someone to a game in an automated fashion when they haven't unlocked the feature as it is considered a 'hack' to overcome the feature unlocking system on WL.

Edited 10/31/2016 19:58:17

Is this is why none of the templates utilize commanders?

Commanders are shit from strategic view anyways, so no harm done banning them :P

It says that I lost to Krzysztof but we never played. I had accepted the game but he didn't. And the game link goes to "The requested game does not exist. It may have been deleted by the game creator."

https://www.warlight.net/multiplayer?GameID=12202134

This is new feature, not bug. CLOT calculated that you have no chance to beat me, so he opted just to move on and gave me a win :-) There's nothing to report, so it would be better if you delete your post and just play current games ;]

hax

@motd, Macedonia no split template
there are recon card and dense fog, you should change one of them

This is intentional. This template was made by Master Bjarke(I think) and it's always been dense fog. A recon card is useful on this template due to the dense fog!

BTW, I'm not familiarized with all the templates, there ara any with special sttings like multy-day, no-split, local-dep, commanders...despite the ones that have it on the name?

There are two templates on multi-attack(they will have MA in the name). There is one template on no-split(also has no-split in the name). There are no LD or commander templates on this ladder. If you do not like some of these templates, you can always "veto" up to 3 of them and the ladder will not give you any games on vetoed templates :)

Is this is why none of the templates utilize commanders?

Yes. Only members have unlocked commanders. Having commander templates reduces my target audience. Most of the players do not seem to like commanders either.

It says that I lost to Krzysztof but we never played. I had accepted the game but he didn't. And the game link goes to "The requested game does not exist. It may have been deleted by the game creator."

https://www.warlight.net/multiplayer?GameID=12202134

Sorry about that. This was a bug which has now been fixed. Any player who doesn't join within 3 days, will be awarded a loss. If both players do not join the game, a winner will be chosen at random. I will also delete the game, once I've recorded a winner(which is why you see the message that the game has been deleted). This is to avoid checking the status of that game and "cleaning" up.

I have also corrected the three games affected by this bug. If these results are inaccurate, please let me know.

Game                                                    Winner            Loser

https://www.warlight.net/multiplayer?GameID=12202131    Nick              Verzehrer
https://www.warlight.net/multiplayer?GameID=12202134    ViralGoat         Krzysztof
https://www.warlight.net/multiplayer?GameID=12202139    Orange            Verzehrer

Hmm, it looks odd having a gamelink to a deleted game, imh, what is the point?

Can't you replace the numeric link, with "Bye" or "Failed to Join" or "Forfeit" , well you get the point :P
Talking about what you see here http://md-ladder.cloudapp.net/player?playerId=8820746826

The game with Verzehrer was made but he didn't join in 3 day's. I remember well as it was the only dubbed template of my 9 games.

Tanks for making this ladder.
Could you please consider to higher the "veto" up to 15, or at least higher it? Highering the veto shouldn't cause problems and only higher the freedom of the ladder users.

Could you please consider to higher the "veto" up to 15, or at least higher it? Highering the veto shouldn't cause problems and only higher the freedom of the ladder users.

No. Just no. Next time think a bit more about your ideas, but it could end up with only 5 available templates between 2 players. truely not what this clot is about!

Yes with both having 15 different veto's, there will be only 5 available templates between 2 players. I don't see a problem with 5 templates they both like, it should only make for better games. But I agree 15 is a bit much, 10 would be better, so there will be at least 15 different templates between players, what is still 50% more then the real-time ladder has.

First of all thank you, the MDL seems to be awesome! Much better than 1v1 ladder for me.

@ Orange: The idea is to find the best player on several templates. The veto is only to vote something out you absolutely hate to play (f.e. I would vote commanders or multi attack out). Maximum 5 veto's seems OK to me.

I would definitely not increase the number of vetos. The whole idea I wasn't sure about because I was afraid that everyone will pick the no split and multi-attack templates and I never wind up playing those. But on the other hand I've happily put one veto to use already :)

Also. Congrats Njord on being 1st in the ladder!

this has to stop. im not 1st on the ladder... i am just the first to be ranked because of having 20 games finished and that is because of me getting booted in several games

You stole the title for the first #1 on the ladder ever from me tough. Very roood.