Just thought I'd bring this up again now that the election is over:

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/141525-2016-presidential-election

Missed on what... three states? (NV, IL, ME) Bit surprised you missed on IL given their historically strong Dem support, but then again MI and WI are historically strong Dem supporters. Impressive nonetheless

Imperator, you rock.

It was 46/50 states, with the three you mentioned + New hampshire. It was basically a fundamentals-based prediction, so the accuracy was going to be limited, but it did seem to work wonders in places like michigan, wisconsin, and pennsylvania. Then again I did completely miss on nevada and illinois as you mentioned.

Edited 11/10/2016 19:32:27

You did far better than most every 'professional' out there who had PA, MI and WI as near locks for her. NH was always a toss up while NV was a bit of a surprise for most it seemed.

Well, it's pretty obvious why the 'professional' pollsters were wrong. They were corrupt and paid/coerced to back Clinton. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's fact.

someone listened to Ron Paul: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67KfHl1eZUM

Have you checked this process on earlier picks?

It's a bit of a pain to get historical state legislature compositions, I'll update you if I have any luck (or if you know of somewhere I can find it you can let me know).

Edited 11/10/2016 21:32:33

Or pollsters were lied to in greater numbers ever before. Due to the fact that they didn't want to be bunched into the sexist, racist, islomapboic, homophobic catagories.

Nonetheless, impressive picks man, well done

Or maybe we'll accept fact and stop believing conspiracies like Clinton running a clean campaign

or maybe we just stop being cucked beyond limits

Umayyad goy?

Ehh, I got 43 out of 50. I didn't count on the rust belt as much as I should have.