i never said there was no proof of ur claim, just that you provided no proof of ur claim

i never responded to what you said, i just added you to the list of Trump supporters who are bad at Warlight.

What do you define as "support" in your study?

I know it when I see it.

6/6

Жұқтыру
Empire of Kilos
Major General Smedley Butler
(((Tabby Juggernaut)))
ＢＵＦＦＡＬＯ
Darth Darth Binks

Fuck!!!! Now I've got to actually win some games, so I can change my name, because Wally fucking ruined this one by using it in one of his sexual tension with Trump posts.

And the fact you even put me on that list is laughable, considering I'm a diplomacy player who's bread and butter is small nations, of fucking course my losses will number as many as Hillary Clintons Deleted Emails.

one of his sexual tension with Trump posts

lol

still waiting to see a Trump supporter who is good at this game (and thus who we can assume might be smart)

Жұқтыру
Empire of Kilos
Major General Smedley Butler
(((Tabby Juggernaut)))
ＢＵＦＦＡＬＯ

A troll, a cat-autist, an anarchist (and technically they don't uphold anyone), and a semi-average? Trump upholder and 1 supercool internet rationalist-philosopher who'd uphold Clinton over Trump, cheerio.

meantime I'm being told off by a fellow who for a while thought that he was the best player on Warlight.

You wield the same kind of weak line of thinking and gross statistic misunderstanding to justify your beliefs that Paugers does to justify his beliefs of racial superiority - cite some source that is one study that got infos on a small group of folk in one kind of examination and then try to make endsays of it that are way beyond what the infos show at all; for Paugers it's maybe some IQ test of a school done by skinhue; for you it's just you trying to justify an insult as a truth. Heck even you could make (wrong) racial endsays on this based that since Trump upholders are "less intelligent", then the ethnicities that are the Trump upholders are less intelligent ones.

Putting aside the truth that less taught does not needingly mean less intelligent, selon the source you gave, there is less than a 10% split between Trump upholding and Clinton upholding in each teaching level but for postgraduate study, which is 21%; so for ~80% population, it's roughly the same upholding by learning level. Then, there's the truth that being a biologist doesn't help you much in politic science.

And at last, Wally Balls is basing intelligence on WL through win rates...everyone knows you got to do it through levels, mate.

Conclusion: Wally Balls is a very stupid person who thought I was a Trump upholder since I also found his psychotic breakdown about Trump winning annoying.
Case closed, typed by an exorciator.

Edited 12/10/2016 06:15:41

When you say there is absolutly a correlation between IQ and education, you lost any crediblity you might have had with me. (That statement is not even close to factual) Also, the link you put up there was for education and Trump. Can you please post links where it has a correlation between IQ and Trump? Just anything other then your observations of Trump rallies or people's stats on warlight.

Infection makes a very good point. According to WB, whites are dumber than blacks and the rich are dumber than the poor.

HTF is that not racist?

come and join guys:
https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=12463950

:)

Why not start using indigenous peoples as bullet fodder?

Why indigenous people failed:
1.Bullet fodder
2.Bullet fodder
3.Bullet fodder

I mean, I'm awful at this game, but I hate Trump. So your position is fatally flawed.

Tabby, I reported you for being so racist. Especially the "Failure to have a sufficiently advanced civilization" comment which is plain ignorant.

There we go again, Wally Balls abusing statistics and thinking he understands something.

Let's first get this out of the way:
Basic statistics will tell you if A is correlated with B and B is correlated with C, then A DOES NOT NEED TO BE CORRELATED WITH C. Shall I put it in bold next time to get the message across?

Next, in your example:
(1) Being good at Warlight is correlated with intelligence (Probably correct with assumingly a causal link from intelligence to being good at Warlight)
(2) Intelligence is correlated with education level (Proven to be correct however more due to other causal sources like wealth of the parents which is correlated with both)
(3) Education level is correlated with Clinton support (Assumingly correct based on both pre-election polls as well as exit polls, but unclear at this point what is the causal link)

What does this prove? Nothing. There is no direct evidence that IQ is correlated (negatively) with Trump support, let alone that being good at Warlight is correlated with Trump support, another step down the line.

Additionally, it is incredibly funny (not) that you post a link to the correlation implies causation wikipedia page as you yourself are blabbering about correlation while making causal statements.

Wally, deal with it: there is no proof. While what you say may be true, there is absolutely and utterly no proof for it and there won't be for years to come. Take my advice and walk away from this and your other ******* threads. By showing how badly you understand the statistics yourself, you are indeed a counterexample to each of the claims you are making as awesomeguy points out.

(And in case you weren't paying attention, I'm neither a Trump nor a Clinton supporter.)

Edited 12/10/2016 20:40:40

You really are a math wolf.

When you say there is absolutly a correlation between IQ and education, you lost any crediblity you might have had with me.

There is obviously a correlation between IQ and education.

I stand by my theory that there is a correlation between intelligence and how good one is at Warlight, despite you clearly being an exception.

Guys we need to make more productive content. Meow!