Black America and the West that built America are separate cultures. They are totally separate in that the world-outlook and the inner-imperative of one is completely alien to the other. Cultures can ONLY exist in opposition; to belong to one culture instead of another is to draw a crucial distinction so grand that men will die to support it. This is historical fact.

"Black Lives Matter" is a Black American militia. It has not been well-articulated by its leaders. It is instinctual, and its aim needs no articulation. In the absence of culture-pathology, all Cultures will resort to existential warfare. The race conflict of 2017 was exacerbated by an anti-Western media eager to provoke a race war, but it would have occurred without.

The West is a civilization with mighty weapons, massive economics, nearly omnipotent political institutions in the context of North America, and massive libraries of culture-history, philosophy, science, and art. The West is vulnerable because the culture-distorter propagandized its youth and told them it was "equality" to help a foreign army, and because it had been exposed to the inevitable poison of "Rationalism" that contaminates a culture during its civilization phase and decline. By contrast "Black Lives Matter" is purely instinctual. The only ideals it possesses are those used to justify the beating of defenseless white individuals by mob, and even those ideals are provided by White intellectuals. "Black Lives Matter" is the political articulation of a stone-age culture that can barely exist beyond subsistence level without Western aid.

As such, this asymmetrical conflict will not be determined by "who is the greater power", but "will the amount of Whites who betray their own interests be sufficient."

"Black Lives Matter" is not a "social justice" movement, as this would imply giving certain people more opportunities within a society, when the goal is actually to destroy Western Civilization and remove its adherents. It is not a force for "equality", for destroying a culture and replacing it with another makes no commentary on equality. "Black Lives Matter" is a primitive military-political unit that opposes Western civilization.

Edited 1/7/2017 01:02:33

The Soviet Union was an Asiatic state that deployed communism to fight against the West

The Soviet Union was an ۞۞۞۞۞Asiatic۞۞۞۞۞ state that deployed ☭☭☭☭☭communism☭☭☭☭☭ to fight against the ✡✡✡✡✡West✡✡✡✡✡

The Soviet Union was an Asiatic state that deployed communism to fight against the West

An "Asiatic" state with a population and economy overwhelmingly in Europe.

Edited 1/7/2017 01:32:11

Why shall an individual die to support a culture? To me cultures exist to serve its members but not the other way around.

Yeah I obviously disagree with BLM. However my opinion on it is different from yours. To me the black ghetto culture is inherently pathological and should be seen as a social illness or enemy of the state. There is no strategy nor goal behind ghetto behaviors.

No BLM does not even qualify as a military-political unit because it does not ask for what actually benefit black Americans, such as less dependency, more policing, etc. It's behaviors are unpredictable.

If culture exists to serve its members (implying culture can be "utilized") then what do individuals exist for? Happiness, wealth, and the like? Even nihilists have reserves about life, and the population at large, the culture-bearing stratum in particular, have not given up life. Men live so they can be creative. The irrational creativity of a population is articulated, a hierarchy takes form; it becomes a culture.

BLM shot five police officers and routinely beats white people, usually solo individuals. Their recent act of heroism was the beating of one mentally retarded white individual by multiple black men. "BLM" organizes itself when Black people want to commit political violence. It is therefore paramilitary.

Black culture is not a "social illness", there is a natural failure of Black people to adapt to Western Civilization. There is no Culture within a Culture. Culture is absolute.

Individuals do not exist for any purpose. Instead all social structures exist for individuals.

Not a great outlook on life. Certainly not an outlook espoused by great men like Napoleon, Washington, or the Hero of the 20th century. How uninspired and stupid!

The inner-imperative of individuals and cultures is articulated by the few, not the masses. It is irrational. The "sense of purpose" is the basis for culture. History will grant all cultures a sense of purpose, even a false, materialistic one in the case of declining civilizations.

I agree with your statement about Blacks. They cannot be assimilated by any other Culture, BECAUSE they are a collection of separate primitive cultures.

just noticed this. "Castle Bravo", are you my undercover brother ?

The race conflict of 2017 was exacerbated by an anti-Western media

Edited 1/7/2017 02:10:28

*tips Western-inspired hat*

Yeah that particular phrasing was inspired by the forums.

so much cancer, i cant think

Cut it out before it develops metastases.

> hegelianism

In the chopper you go