Didn't take long to see the bullshit in your arguments. Seen them before, nothing special.
Just some examples:
The azimuthal equidistant projection (note that word, it means that a sphere is projected onto a disk) does not accurately represent distances
The disk moving upwards does not explain gravity. Falling things are accelerating. If you say that's just because the disk is accelerating then you are an idiot. People not falling would be able to feel the acceleration
In any case, don't you ever say that the burden of proof goes to the globe "model". A model using a few laws and rules to describe everything makes more sense than one that has to make up a new rule for every new thing discovered.
Keep believing in your bullshit theory that the earth is a disk with a dumbass spotlight sun performing both circular and vertical movements, while every other planet in our solar system moves in a trajectory that looks like an orbit around the sun, people can't perceive photons that have been emitted from far away (as if they are different than any other photon), etc etc
I could go on forever but you're probably a troll
Join the Flat Earth Society today: 2017-08-08 21:54:33
No. The earth is a rhomb. It kinda explain istelf. I mean, earth isn´t a globe, you know?-It´s more of a rhomb. If there wouldn´t be gravity we would fall into space. But since the earth is a rhomb, there is gravity. Thus we don´t fall into space. It is obvious.
Edited 8/8/2017 22:21:54
Posts 1 - 19 of 19
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
