Hmmm I try to give you some legitimate reason to claim more land. You rejected it. That's weird.

Because most people are not selfish dicks, unlike you.

there is no evidence that such laws existed in Africa back then, right?

back then there were no laws. Only thing that could prevent you from claiming your neigbour's "house" would be him and his willingness to beat you up.

All this logic is bullshit made up to justify stealing land, and you even said it yourself.

If you are after laws then I can tell you that there is no laws that allow you to claim property that is not yours.

Having land is good.

Exactly. Everyone wants some land.

Now you are nitpicking on other people's responses. The point is that you have no rigth to claim Africa only because your ancestors used to live there and gave it up volunterly.

^^ Exactly. If it is not legitimately owned by anyone, and it was never legitimately owned by any of your ancestors, you have no right to it.

You wouldn't have that right even if it was legitimately owned by your ancestors, but you think you do for some reason.

evolutionary parades

Yeah, let's waste people's time for no reason at all, what a great idea.


So you admit that

All this logic is bullshit made up to justify stealing land, and you even said it yourself.

>you use a bullshit argument for your point
>I state why (I think) the argument is bullshit
>you ignore my point and try to justify it another way
>I state why the other argument is bullshit too
>you abandon the need for justification and just state your purpose anyway, which is to get land in Africa.
>your argument is not bullshit?

Anyways, you're just shitposting now, so I'm out.

''I am not greedy unlike you apparently.''


Funny you put it that way Cata, didn't you critisize someone who said greed was not good?

>you use a bullshit argument for your point
>I state why (I think) the argument is bullshit
>you ignore my point and try to justify it another way
>I state why the other argument is bullshit too
>you abandon the need for justification and just state your purpose anyway, which is to get land in Africa.
>your argument is not bullshit?

that's what it like to argue with the top "rationalist" of WL

if someone actually thinks tabby is the top debater ill actually shoot myself tabby isnt dumb but when you address her main point and squash it she doesnt even defend it she just swiftly changes points lmao...

and look at you guys when this video made u stfu u start saying africa should be flooded and what not lmao thats how u know u have cognitive dissonance nannannanna

However human origins do give all humans a right to enter Africa to live, do business and purchase land. You can't legitimately claim that people whose ancestors left Africa a long time ago no longer deserve to see or live in the land their ancestors came from.

I dont see why ancestry gives you any rights. You still give people perks based on things they have no influence on.
Everyone should have the rigth to live, do business and purchase land anywhere as long as it doesnt hurt the local community or the world as a whole (climate for example).

Edited 9/3/2017 16:24:22

They are.

For me.

Ancestry does offer rights imo. But my Ancestors left Africa so I don't have claim on Africa land.