Stop, Fizzeronian pawn

Definetely from Fizzer's side. Cute of Pooh to think that you get several warnings before you get suspended or that your action has to be reasonable.
Keep dreaming.

Don't be an idiot and you won't get a suspension

I actually see a positive correlation between intelligence and getting warned/banned

^
Care to elaborate on that?

I'm pretty intelligent, and I get a ****ton of warnings

You. Pretty intelligent? Nice fucking joke.

1v1: 34 / 153 (22%)

If that were the case you wouldn't be absolute fucking trash at a game that revolves around logic, problem solving, and math.

Protip: If I can beat you 20 games in a row, you probably shouldn't toot your horn about how intelligent you think you are.

Edited 9/11/2017 06:12:44

I'm just **** at WL strategy

Article of me getting a medal for being really good at maths n ***** 2.5 yrs ago
http://mags4dorset.co.uk/allenbourn-pupil-wins-gold/#.WbYuKtGQzDc

It's pretty difficult to even get Bronze at that age

Being good at warlight requires the same skills as any other logic-based activity.

you guys make me want to gouge my eyes out

Being good at warlight requires the same skills as any other logic-based activity.

Disagreed, most templates are most of the time just beancounting.

Your opinion holds no value cata, because you, like Japanball, are a shitty player.

To speak on what it takes to be good at something, you must first be good at it.

Edited 9/11/2017 11:46:05

^

Your opinion holds no value cata, because you, like Japanball, are a shitty player.

To speak on what it takes to be good at something, you must first be good at it.

Your opinion holds no value either, because you use an ad hominem attack to strength your point. Learn to argue.

That's not ad-hominem.

Ad-hominem would be saying your opinion holds no value because your avatar is a cat and cat lovers are morons.

The fact that you need to be good at something before you can judge what it takes to be good at something is fact.

When you have succeeded, you tend to know why you succeeded. If you fail, you tend to not know why you failed, if you did, then you wouldn't have failed.

I can play you 20 times, beat you every time, and then point out the reasons you lost each game. If you were able to determine why you lost each game I wouldn't beat you 20 games in a row.

I'm not looking for someone with a peak ladder rating 600 lower than mine to try and explain to me what it takes to be good at Warlight.

You are roughly a 57th percentile player, there's more than two standard deviations separating our ingame abilities. Pointing that out, is not ad-hominem.

Edited 9/11/2017 12:16:51

This gets cringier and cringier. From whining to "I'm good at Risk", the amount of attention-seeking is beyond awful.

Telling people to stop boasting about their intelligence when they're empirically bad at something that hinges on mathematics isn't attention-seeking.

I don't care if people think I'm good, they are however bad.

That's not ad-hominem.

Ad-hominem would be saying your opinion holds no value because your avatar is a cat and cat lovers are morons.

The fact that you need to be good at something before you can judge what it takes to be good at something is fact.

When you have succeeded, you tend to know why you succeeded. If you fail, you tend to not know why you failed, if you did, then you wouldn't have failed.

I can play you 20 times, beat you every time, and then point out the reasons you lost each game. If you were able to determine why you lost each game I wouldn't beat you 20 games in a row.

I'm not looking for someone with a peak ladder rating 600 lower than mine to try and explain to me what it takes to be good at Warlight.

First thing first, you are an alt of unknown origin.
Second, if you are referring to 1v1 ladder, then you should know that rating is not everything. Not to mention, my last run was over a year ago and you dont even show off your ratings.
Third, you can know why you are failing and still fail. For me its lack of dedication, I simply dont care.
Last but not least, learn to argue. I dont know why I am argueing with someone who doesnt even recognise their ad hominem.

Edited 9/11/2017 12:25:49

Telling people to stop boasting about their intelligence when they're empirically bad at something that hinges on mathematics isn't attention-seeking.

I don't care if people think I'm good, they are however bad.

This is the Internet, we can speak our mind. Suck it up. Besides that, who says Zephyrum was reffering to you? The world doesnt revolve around you.

Edited 9/11/2017 12:29:48