aka (((Ayn Rosenbaum)))

your mom

Who is Ayn Rand?

your mom


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Edited 2/13/2018 06:17:57

Lasalle, the Jowosh nobber

Karl Marx. All his premises and predictions were wrong.

all of them because they were all globeheads as far as i know

Thanks Wulfhere. Ayn Rand seemed to be an interesting person. I will probably look up her life achievements. - thanks for pointing her out!

I like Ayn Rand. Randian economic policies + Natsoc racial policies - antisemitism = perfect world.

Edited 2/15/2018 16:32:12

lol no
Tabby stop being dumb

^I'm not dumb. The idea that variants of Natsoc racial policies have to contain a highly irrational package namely antisemitism is completely absurd. Antisemitism is inherently incompatible with perfection of humanity. Hence it is inherently absurd to believe that de-Judaizing which is like throwing away the cream of the crop is somehow benefitial.

Edited 2/15/2018 16:38:01

Hitler said that Slavs were untermensch??? even according to your pseudoscience Tabbster that doesn't ring true.

^This is also nonsense. Hitlerism without his specific beliefs on particular groups is good. We just need to change some parameters.

Edited 2/15/2018 18:42:31

so it actually has nothing to do with Hitler?

^Why? Can't we use abstraction? The essence of Natsoc at the meta-level is simply that Group A rules and Group B drools. For example Group A can take all the lands of Group B, etc. Why do Jews have to be a subgroup of Group B especially since they are smart?

Edited 2/15/2018 23:11:48

Stop stereotyping, some facts are results of a lack of population for the survey. They are a world minority, therefore there are less people dumbing down their average IQ when surveys are made. IQ is not even fully related to intelligence in the first place. Intelligence is a very complex thing, it can be affected by upbringing, genetics, hell, even perspective. These 'colored' people are mainly less 'intelligent' because of their lack of education. They weren't always so poor and stupid, there were multiple glorious civilizations in its history, such as ghana/mali, therefore it isn't genetics in their case. Asians excel because of their family upbringing, famiry honor and all that. Jews probably excel for the same reasons. Stop generalizing as if they are all different simply because of ethnicity, there are 7 billion people in this world, and none them are the same as the other.

Stop generalizing

^The problem isn't about skin color. Instead it is about peafowlism.

Peafowls brought their destruction and shame on themselves. There is no need to pity them. When the ancestors of civilized peoples dealt with harsh laws and harsh weather their ancestors were eating free coconuts and having lots of sex. When you spare a peafowl remember what northern and desert peoples went through. Remember the wheat and barley fields civilized men labored in and the fertile land on which peafowls thrived with little labor.

Edited 2/16/2018 01:39:20

What the fuck is a peafowl

^A peafowl is defined as a member of a traditionally sexually promiscuous ethnic group. This is hard to believe because in medieval Europe or the medieval Middle East there was no such thing but this phenomenon does exist elsewhere on this planet.

One fun fact about peafowls is that they are almost always outside any civilization and do not adapt to any civilization well. You can't find native peafowls in places such as Europe, India, Iran and China. There is a reason why this is true, namely civilization and peafowlism are inherently opposed to each other. All humans started out as peafowls. Some humans have progressed passed this stage while others have not.

Peafowls tend to be violent, lazy, promiscuous and illiterate. They usually traditionally live in tropical areas with lots of food and water which make intensive agriculture unnecessary. Intensive agriculture requires male labor and a tribe that does not require male labor tends to have lazy, violent, promiscuous and rapey men. Peafowls everywhere behave in roughly similar ways. Hence there is no reason why the African variant of peafowls are fundamentally different from the Austronesian or Native American forms of peafowls. They differ from each other in terms of degree but not in terms of kind. All peafowls are peafowls.

Edited 2/16/2018 21:06:59

Western countries are the sluttiest in the world