| Ratio of armies per turn to its number of territories: 2012-02-22 12:11:43 |
Flesius9517
Level 54
Report
|
What is the best? 1:2? 2:3? 3:5? or others?
|
| Ratio of armies per turn to its number of territories: 2012-02-22 12:20:30 |
Moros 
Level 50
Report
|
Are you talking about giving bonus values to bonuses in a map of your own?
If that's true, then it doesn't matter which ratio you use, as long as you are consistent.
|
| Ratio of armies per turn to its number of territories: 2012-02-22 12:49:45 |
Diabolicus
Level 60
Report
|
Same ratios should only be applied when bonuses are of equal size and complexity and have a comparable number of connections.
A bonus with only two or three inbound connections is a lot easier to defend than a bonus with a dozen connections.
A bonus, where all inbound connections lead to the same one or two territories is a lot easier to defend than a bonus where all territories have inbound connections of their own.
etc...
|
| Ratio of armies per turn to its number of territories: 2012-02-22 14:20:54 |
The Duke of Ben
Level 55
Report
|
It's also generally a good idea to scale the ratio. Larger bonuses (which are harder to finish and harder to retain) should have a slightly better ratio than smaller bonuses. In Medium Earth, the small bonuses are 3:4, while some of the larger ones are 5:6, 5:7, or 6:7, which is slightly better.
|
