GUYS STOP!
LET ME WIN!

No

I just like how Onoma wrote Pater Noster in old church slavonic.

Can I win?

pinky promise i will put the coins in good use if u let me win those (not like cowbody who is gonna stack those like his other coins)

I trust you.

thank you. i appreciate that

I'll suck your blowjob if you give me the coins

Give yourself a blowjob and I say the coins are yours.

I like pokemon, you like pokemon, gib me

coins

King K. Rool, Chrom, Dark Samus, Simon Belmont and Richter Belmont are all confirmed for Smash Ultimate! :O

I have less than 100 coins. I only use coins for membership :p

If i got these coins I would have more coins ;).

i have a grand total of 1 coin, can I not have some more? ;)

MINE.

Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly
Most texts on writing style encourage authors to avoid overly‐complex words. However, a majority of undergraduates admit to deliberately increasing the complexity of their vocabulary so as to give the impression of intelligence. This paper explores the extent to which this strategy is effective. Experiments 1–3 manipulate complexity of texts and find a negative relationship between complexity and judged intelligence. This relationship held regardless of the quality of the original essay, and irrespective of the participants' prior expectations of essay quality. The negative impact of complexity was mediated by processing fluency. Experiment 4 directly manipulated fluency and found that texts in hard to read fonts are judged to come from less intelligent authors. Experiment 5 investigated discounting of fluency. When obvious causes for low fluency exist that are not relevant to the judgement at hand, people reduce their reliance on fluency as a cue; in fact, in an effort not to be influenced by the irrelevant source of fluency, they over‐compensate and are biased in the opposite direction. Implications and applications are discussed. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

There's a difference between using big words to elucidate something and writing long winded driveling sentences that make no more sense than had they been put simply.