Thanks, Farah, you are really earning that diamond rn

Shut up plat

Tornado wasn't invited to cookies.

Bonsai wasn't either, I want the diamond back.

Should be fixed now.

I have been made aware that

Btw, totally unrelated subject. If any of the remaining Masters are looking for a good clan or to play in CL11, feel free to get poa... I mean, to contact us. We also have TBest running CL so covering all of our cheatings in order to ensure we finish at a good position and look good.

may sound like some trash talk. So to clarify, this was supposed to be a joke and anything sounding familiar to previous CLs is totally unvoluntary. I have always had and still have full respect for Masters clan, its members and especially its leader MOTD. The more you cheat, the more likeable you appear to me, why do you think I chose MH (Outlaws didn't exist at the time) ?
I realise now that specifying this now may sound like trolling -_-' how do I stop this ?

@Cowboy were you in MH as an alt of another clan ? That tells me something but I can't remember what my reaction was tbh.

@AI indeed. If we still are in A next season, we send our team D, with the likes of Norman, Fifi, myself, aldehyde, Pana (I know he's not in the clan any more, that's the point) and other inactive players we can find. We may also forfeit one tourney to make sure the handicap is high enough. Well even with that, we may stay oh boy. Maybe we bring Jo Jo back so he spoils more games what do you think ? And other GG alts to spy on our strategies and line ups ? Well let's see how CL11 goes first, TBest already thinks we'll end up with too much margin so he decided to play against. Fair enough.

Edited 3/5/2019 13:34:38

I realise now that specifying this now may sound like trolling -_-' how do I stop this ?

You could stop posting.

Supergamerz, haha i joined back when I was in 101st shortly after leaving FCC.
Joined MH, and quite enjoyed it, despite you calling me a spy ;)

Statisticians
2v2 Final Earth:
Nauzhror OUT
[ARM]BelSon IN

Your substitution has been noted. I'll update the sheet and the third post of the thread once I get on my own pc. Any games created with Nauzhror from this moment on in 2v2 FE may be seen as forfeit and should not be played.

Also, keep in mind that you need to PM the tournament creator with your substitution as well, since they might miss the forum post.

Edited 3/6/2019 23:33:25

Will the games be created on a scheduled basis?

Edited 3/6/2019 23:27:08

I'm currently watching back the kick-off stream to see what i said about that.

You could create the new games when the main tourney creates the "dead" one between the two clans, then just surrender both when you're done.

Unfortunately, even though that makes too much sense, it will require some maintenance from the teams and drama will ensue if one team boots the "dead" game and the team that didn't make any subs ends up with a 3rd game at one time.

While I agree that creating the games when the main tourney creates the "dead" ones is the most logical way to go, I know myself and will forget to check the tourneys with substitutions. Therefore, I'll create all the games at once and expect the clans participating to make sure they're finished in reasonable time. Keep in mind that there's no 3 day join limit or something like that for these games. If clans refuse to join them and the end of the season is nearing, I'll send them a mail with a deadline.

I don't see a solution to avoid a scenario in which the opponent team gets 3 games at once. If you're create all games at once then ofc Stats FE team would even play 4 at once. Even if that scenario isn't perfect, as long as nobody has an easier/better solution it is what it is.

What might work is that the opponent team avoids to play the 3rd game they get in the original tournament and just create the rest of their games manually, after one of their next is done to stay on the same game count of 2 games at a time at most. That probably ends up in creating all future games of that clan manually in that specific tournament, but so be it.

I don't think the organizer should take that extra workload then, but rather the involved player/the player or team asking for it.

If that would be an option that we could chose instead of playing 3 at once than i personally would favour such a scenario, especially if that adds up to 6 due to substitutions in the other team tournaments i'm playing. Obviously i have to tell the opponent that i'm planning to doing that and obviously i have to create them in a reasonable time after one of the 2 games has finished otherwise i would lose those games. And obviously i have to inform the opponent in the game chat of the created game that it's the CL game they need to join. I would need to post that link here and/or give it to the organizer to post it here so it can be checked if that opponent is joining the game. Basically u will just need to arrange something with the opponent team and that should be possible, right.

And as i said that would be just an individual option the players of one team can choose from if they don't want to playing more than 2 games at once in that tournament. If a team isn't asking for it than they just get the standard creation by the organizer, risking that they get 3 on more games at once.

Edited 3/7/2019 08:40:26

I don't see a solution to avoid a scenario in which the opponent team gets 3 games at once. If you're create all games at once then ofc Stats FE team would even play 4 at once.

6 at once for one of the teammembers... T_T

Edited 3/8/2019 07:23:47

If you're create all games at once then ofc Stats FE team would even play 4 at once.

They won't play 4 games if they don't join them all at the same time. As long as the games are finished before the season's ended, they can spread their joining times.

What might work is that the opponent team avoids to play the 3rd game they get in the original tournament and just create the rest of their games manually, after one of their next is done to stay on the same game count of 2 games at a time at most. That probably ends up in creating all future games of that clan manually in that specific tournament, but so be it.

Creating all their games manually once is annoying. Checking every subbed team's tournaments all the time to see if a game needs to be created is something i'm not gonna do. And since i create the substitutions, i'd say that option is off of the table.

I don't think the organizer should take that extra workload then, but rather the involved player/the player or team asking for it.

If you're saying the players should create the substitution games themselves, then no. First of all I'd probably lose track of the scores during the season. Second of all, it's easy to cheat this.


While this may lead to some teams having to play three games at once, even if they didn't make a substitution, this is the most reasonable option from my point of view, as i have to keep track of everything.

I think he meant the teams should be responsible for telling you that a replacement game needs to be made. It seems like you're really enjoying this.

Ah, then i misunderstood. If the teams involved notify me, then yeah. That would work. The question is what happens when teams don't notify me. Not sure what you mean with that last comment, i'm just trying to make this go smoothly without having to go through a set of tournament everyday.

That's what i meant. If i would have the choice between playing a 3rd game, so a 5th team game essentially at the same time or beeing responsible for organizing to create it on my own to keep the game count at 2 games at once, than i'm rather choosing the last option. Obviously i would notify you or post it here in the thread and communicate it to the opponent team in both games, the one i create and the original one in the tournament. I didn't thought about the possibility of cheating. You or likely we all have to check every little detail, but on the other hand i think it would be seen by the opponents if something works different than in the other games, so i hope that wouldn't become a problem or a time intense task to check every little detail of that game. But i can see that as a potential problem.

Edited 3/9/2019 06:18:13