well wouldn't bossss be the best? Everyone else looks like alts. Even Oliebol looks like an alt XD

its sort of expected you need 1k+ games to be a good player or else you'd be suspected as an alt

I was a better player at around 600 games played than I am now. Better discipline and paid more attention. Did far better at the ladder in that stretch as well.

perhaps the opposition wasnt as good either

http://warlight.net/Profile?p=298222586

Pink, if anything I would say they were better, which in turn was why I was better. Now I can win many games without really having to think outside the box or do anything special. Before it seemed you had to work more for the wins many times... now you have the fake 50's with their loads of points and little actual understanding of the game

What does it really matter if the account is an alt, really? It doesn't diminish they're ability, does it?

you really are clueless, aren't you ...

Depends on template...... I suppose i could be on this list..... This is my alt with 370 odd game and my old one had about 400 odd games but had a terrible win rate and boot rate

And I agree with Apollos suggestion

I agree as well, though he's not exactly an "up and comer" some he's been around since 2011.

My vote goes to Greendragon.

http://warlight.net/Profile?p=4016806095

He even hasn't got 500 games but he's becomming a very good player.
he's not an alt. Oke, he's not really 'up and comming', he's here already for a time..

Greetz

Edited 3/29/2014 10:14:08

Forgot about this guy, he's very good. I've played with him a lot. The reason why he has so many unranked games, is because he plays only practise on the open games, as he doesn't want cheap wins.

I don't like that people 'nominated' in this thread are accused of being alts. People have topped the ladder with <500 games played.

Being a good player doesn't require a ton of games, it only requires that you pay attention to your games. If you're a quick learner, it is quite possible to become a top player with only a couple hundred games under your belt.

My guess is that low gamecount top players simply don't play RT much, that's certainly the case for me.

Theyre still probably alts.

Although not "up and coming" I also vote for Ko. I've played some tournament games with him as his partner and the depth at which he analyzes the game is impressive (and beyond me at times).

"what do you classify as a "good" player? win %, attitude, etc?"

Certainly not attitude. Attitude would determine if I'd want them in my clan, or want to play with them, but not whether I felt they were good. "good" is a measurement of ability.

Win % is a factor, but even then not without a knowledge of who they have played. I'd rather watch 5 games someone played than look at their winrate, I can judge their skill much better from watching 5 random games than the winrate would ever enable.

"Depends on template...... I suppose i could be on this list..... This is my alt with 370 odd game and my old one had about 400 odd games but had a terrible win rate and boot rate"

Your current account has an awful win rate too other than 4v4, but I'm not counting 80% after 5 such games as being any real indication there.

Edited 3/30/2014 06:53:54