<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 20 of 41   1  2  3  Next >>   
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-27 17:13:48


awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
Anyone interested in being pared up for some badass 1v1's post in here ill set up between the two of you anyone who thinks they made an intence game should defently post the link of it in this thread to thatd be pretty awesome to watch
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-28 00:43:35


[WM] Anonymous 
Level 57
Report
I'm in
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-28 02:53:46


NoobSchool (AHoL) • apex 
Level 59
Report
I'll play also.
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-28 03:42:39

♦CPU♦ Ryan2
Level 3
Report
is it only strategic 1v1 or will it be other templates too
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-28 05:19:25


awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
this is for inside only im sorry guys
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-28 05:21:26


awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
we;; actually screw it ill let everyone know that yal are interested so if anyone fancies playing against anyone who posts this they can come take their pick of an oponent i had originally created this for inside games but i dont see any reason why someone else shouldnt be able to play
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-28 05:39:21


{RSP}Mr. Jaberwochy
Level 18
Report
I am up for a game
let me know when yall want to throw down

I am usually on most around 1-3 pacific or we can do multi days just create and invite =D
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-31 20:20:17

{RSP} Quick Learner
Level 3
Report
Im down to vs just about anyone challenge me :) actually dont challenge me if you 1v1 win rate is under 60 percent
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-31 20:38:33


Richard Sharpe 
Level 59
Report
So in other words Quick, you don't think Red or Noobschool above are even worthy of your time, eh? Neither has a 60% 1v1 percentage after all...
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-31 21:07:33


Rorschach 
Level 54
Report
What's the point of posting such a thread if not open to the public? Set this up via game chat - much easier.
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-07-31 21:09:26


Gnullbegg 
Level 49
Report
Someone should learn about the insignificance of win%, the quicker the better.
And no, that's not a challenge. I don't challenge players with less than 200 1v1s played. ;)
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-01 15:31:35

{RSP} Quick Learner
Level 3
Report
lol Richard you must hold a grudge against someone in rsp you trooll in each thread did someone not play nicely with you? perhaps you shouldnt be posting in threads from a strategic clan since you already told us that you have no skill or strategy and your to afraid to 1v1 any of us? your opinion will carry more weight to me if you knew how to play the game
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-01 15:58:02


Ska2D2 
Level 55
Report
Quick ... I'm sensing that you don't take well to criticism ... well i'm guessing because you really loathe comments that don't agree with your viewpoint the toys probably would end up in pieces on the floor if someone actually did critisize or heaven forbid actually troll you.

Getting your 1v1 win rate high is very easy for a competent player - heck open up my profile I managed it and I'm no where near the level of some people with a lower win rate. The reason is that it is too easy to play a lot of bad players. Those that exclusively play good players aren't going to have the highest win rate - but they are far more formidable than a player who chooses to only play noobs.

If you are setting your filters to only play the best because you want to learn and challenge yourself you will win less games but get better. The same applies to the ladder it matches you with your peers within a range.

As a comparison you could maybe think about pros who only played amateurs - there win rate in any sport or game would be higher than a pro who only competed against the other top players.

Richard isn't trolling you - in either thread he is pointing something out that has common sense, this is the internet, everything is not an attack on you.
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-01 16:08:35


Richard Sharpe 
Level 59
Report
Ska, don't bother... Quick is just Agressive's dupe account.

http://warlight.net/Forum/Thread.aspx?ThreadID=4193&Offset=0
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-02 04:14:20


awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
just to clear things up Quick learner is my nephews account nd i have made it for him hes attending college atm so i attend to his tournaments everyonce nawhile when asked also richard is clearly trying to troll obviously startin a fiht for no reason when posting no decent members are interested in joining rsp when each player we have if very good
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-02 04:40:15


Ska2D2 
Level 55
Report
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-02 12:22:43

NZPhoenix (AHOL) 
Level 64
Report
I'm confused aggressive/quick.

One moment you admit "ive never side stepped it just saw nothing wrong with it." - http://warlight.net/Forum/Thread.aspx?ThreadID=4193&Offset=20 - post 22

But here you write: "just to clear things up Quick learner is my nephews account nd i have made it for him hes attending college atm so i attend to his tournaments everyonce nawhile".

College must be difficult... I remember grammar being graded in college.
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-02 17:30:16


awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
still hooked up on grammar? i feel bad for you boston lifes must be hard for you
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-02 17:41:35


myhandisonfire 
Level 54
Report
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 2012-08-02 17:47:34

NZPhoenix (AHOL) 
Level 64
Report
I'm confused at how grammar, or my interest in proper grammar, has anything to do with my most recent post regarding quick and aggresive being the same person?
Posts 1 - 20 of 41   1  2  3  Next >>