Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-26 23:29:12 |
Kelevra
Level 59
Report
|
Not sure I’m understanding the percentages. My overall win rate is 62% across all games, but my highest rate against any individual is only 37%? On the nemesis side, the top is 34%, and all the others are less than that. What calculation is used? I’m sure I have dozens (hundreds?) of folks who are 1-0 or 0-1 against me. Wouldn’t those 100% and 0% scores be indicated?
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-27 02:11:35 |
Fizzer
Level 64
Warzone Creator
Report
|
Show the top 10 players that have defaeted you most often Oops, I changed it to 30 and forgot to update that text. I'll fix it. What are the percentages shown next to "Your nemesis" and "Dominations"? Percentage of games you were both in that you won. They'd only add up to 100% if you only ever played 1v1s against them. Is there a simpler way to access this page than through the link in this thread? It'll be in the drop down under your name in the next update. I am not a member because there was no pressing need but bought my son lifetime membership for his birthday as a sort of thanks to you Awesome, thanks for supporting the game! I’m sure I have dozens (hundreds?) of folks who are 1-0 or 0-1 against me. Wouldn’t those 100% and 0% scores be indicated? It only includes people you play frequently, since I didn't want small sample sizes to pollute the list.
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-28 00:31:52 |
FireStorm
Level 50
Report
|
yeah, some of these features may be cool, among more, but keep in mind that this setting/feature just came out, so everybody make sure they arent like "fizzer is slacking not to put this" like i said, he just came out with this, so be happy with what is there (but requesting more is perfectly fine)
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-29 01:51:56 |
mslasm
Level 62
Report
|
Fizzer,:
1) >> What are the percentages shown next to "Your nemesis" and "Dominations"? >Percentage of games you were both in that you won. They'd only add up to 100% if you only ever played 1v1s against them.
I understand the logic and it has some sense, but
a) it is ridiculous for a player to be called "a nemesis" when you NEVER lost a game (either 1v1 or team) to that player, and she is a nemesis only because in a "8 vs 8" tourney your team (where both of you were) lost 20 out of 25 games or something like that. At the very least games where you are on the same team should be excluded, regardless of the game result!
b) it is also completely unintuitive when ALL your nemesis are below 50% and most are below 30%. And this is for an account with only ~20-25% FFA games, with lots of players who actually won most their games against me.
----
Also the threshold to filter out players you only played a few games with seems to be too high. My account is 5 years old with close to 4000 games, yet I only have 12 people in the list (same 12 people in nemesis and dominations), with the last "domination" having a score of 8%? Woo, I dominated the guy! :) (BTW, the same player in nemesis section is still below 50%).
Maybe lowering the required number of games will also resolve the other problem automatically by putting people who are actually "nemeiss" and "victims" in the corresponding sections. I understand the computational resources required for that may be prohibitive, but maybe try to lower the threshold at least a bit, by 20%, by 30%?
Edited 4/29/2020 01:59:19
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-29 02:27:19 |
Fizzer
Level 64
Warzone Creator
Report
|
same 12 people in nemesis and dominations It requires that you have played 20 games with them. Presumably this means there's only 12 people you've played 20 or more games against. I will lower this number to 15
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-29 03:48:54 |
mslasm
Level 62
Report
|
> I will lower this number to 15
Thank you, I think this will help to make the list better. Obviously you know better, and maybe my account is a one-off, but I would assume 3-4K games is somewhere in the middle, so if you planned to have 30 nemesis/dominations the lower number should bebetter
----
What about not counting games where you and the other player are on the same team? I mean, it does not say anything about how you play against that person, good or bad? Any hard reason to keep including those games? (I'm not talking FFA, I'm talking about team games. I know there are many players who mostly play FFA and who still want to see their fun stats)
Edited 4/29/2020 03:49:52
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-29 12:38:47 |
Viking1007
Level 60
Report
|
@Fizzer, I really like the concept of this idea, but I have a questions/thoughts.
So, I have played "Littlegrass" over 50 times in FFA and huge team games - But, in 1v1, over 100 games also - I have beaten him about 85% of the time - So, my stats should show that I have beaten him 85% , right?
Yes, except for the case that I've played in games with him in FFA's and Huge team games.
Due to this, my winrate against him is now only 25%, instead of, taking into account only 1v1's, 85%.
Otherwise from the fact that I don't think team games and FFA's should be included in this, it is otherwise a great update! Nice work Fizzer!
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-04-29 14:28:46 |
Viking1007
Level 60
Report
|
:(
Viking doesn't even thank me for being able to see this
Thank you so much riskboy for buying me a membership!!! :D :D
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-05-06 18:13:18 |
Coronel Gavilan
Level 59
Report
|
Excellent concept Fizzer! we need to expand this, great info can come along.
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-05-08 06:22:27 |
Ryan Doherty
Level 62
Report
|
10 most common teammates 10 most common opponents
How about some sort of "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon" type page/feature, where it'd show a branching tree of users you played directly against (ie. 5000 unique opponents), then show 2nd degree (ie. 3,000 unique opponents that you haven't played against, but that those 5000 opponents played against), then 3rd degree.. until the furthest connection..
How about some Raffle stats? - # of raffles entered - # of raffles won - largest raffle won - date/time & amount
# of hours played # of turns played # of attacks made # of armies lost
Edited 5/8/2020 06:23:20
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-05-14 17:10:02 |
Master Shredtail
Level 58
Report
|
Still no info present besides the top category.
|
Fun Stats for members: 2020-05-14 17:31:49 |
krinid
Level 63
Report
|
Although it's only the top 3 categories that I care about.
Best Come-From-Behind Victories --> Though I question how this is evaluated, b/c I have better Come-From-Behind Victories than are shown here. (;
Most Defeated Players Players that you often defeat: None yet, check back later!
Greatest Nemesis Players that often defeat you: None yet, check back later!
And don't care about these - does anyone care who joined WZ on the same day as them? I'd rather see some coin stats like coin wheel total income disitributions, raffle stats, coin games, etc. Or best (highest win %) templates, etc.
Shared Birthdays Players whose Warzone accounts were created on the same day as yours: None, sorry :(
Shared Birthday Anniversaries Players whose Warzone accounts were created on the same day as yours, but not the same year: None yet, check back later!
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|