Booting players: 2012-08-03 10:45:10 |
Ironheart
Level 54
Report
|
Careful aggressive,one of the path to bad clanshipness is taking criticism as an insult.
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 10:53:02 |
RvW
Level 54
Report
|
VaporX,
I see your point, but have you considered such a feature would be very prone to abuse? "Meh, don't bother setting filters or blacklist entries, just manually remove people you don't like (for whatever reason)." It would mean that if you join a game, you could be randomly kicked out again for no apparent reason. In my opinion that would be a pretty horrible system...
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 11:30:06 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
give him a break ironheart, you dont need to be Albert Einstein to manage a small clan lol, we'r a pretty free/relaxed clan anyway
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 12:58:19 |
The Fire_mad32 Juggernaut (Away from game)
Level 12
Report
|
You can remove players that way....
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 13:17:07 |
Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
@Nike... Well it's easy to manage a clan when half the clan is you and your alternates!
@Hellbender, what you are talking about can already be done. It's as simple as setting the pre-reqs to only allow a specific type of player. There was some chatter on here earlier this month about a member of the 'elite' clan doing just that. Of course, playing in such a manner is only cheating yourself as you will never improve by such means.
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 14:52:18 |
awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
|
i like richard poin on this you defnetly could make a clan with many alternates ima do it and call it mini mees
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 14:57:49 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
richard, i doubt one can have a lot of accounts which have played over 500-1000 games each.
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 17:53:41 |
italliondude
Level 2
Report
|
yes actually its simple math the average person who plays warlight for lets say 9 hours a week and lets say that if one was trying to get a high game count they only played one v one games they could play 100 games a week in nine weeks they would have a thousand games then move on to another account see simple math
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 17:55:59 |
italliondude
Level 2
Report
|
excuse me ten weeks not nine
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 18:45:04 |
Gnullbegg
Level 49
Report
|
Yup, simple math indeed.
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 19:10:36 |
italliondude
Level 2
Report
|
heeyyyyy my mommy says im special ur luky i got what i did
|
Booting players: 2012-08-03 20:22:04 |
BearsBeetsBattlestarGalactica
Level 20
Report
|
Clearly, italliondude (horribly spelled wrong; intentional?) and {RSP}Agressive#Number's# are the same person. I cant be the only one who notices that the speech pattern is identical.
Anyway, I do question how 9 hours a week translates into 100 games/week.That comes to 11.1 games per hour, or about 5.5 minutes per game. That's pretty fast, even as a 1v1... Unless you are surrendering within the first 3 turns, I would say that it's a bit of an overestimation.
|
Booting players: 2012-08-04 01:57:46 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
no way stallion and agressive are same people, just by looking at stats i think agressive plays a lot better, and lots of people on warlight have bad spelling.
by Maths, yes, it is possible to have multiple accounts that have a lot of games played, but i doubt people would have so much time to do that! -.-'
oh and awesomeguy, agressive is looking for clan challenges, you can invite him to a game where you guys can talk it out.
|
Booting players: 2012-08-04 03:00:11 |
awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
|
so much funny in these forums let em belive what they want nike. you achieve anythign from disagreeing with trolls? by all means answer serious question.. but its easy to tell theyre just trying to play on my nerves.. some of them are atleast Awesome guy i can see where your going fact is i have no multiple
|
Booting players: 2012-08-04 03:07:00 |
awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
|
RvW
VaporX,
I see your point, but have you considered such a feature would be very prone to abuse? "Meh, don't bother setting filters or blacklist entries, just manually remove people you don't like (for whatever reason)." It would mean that if you join a game, you could be randomly kicked out again for no apparent reason. In my opinion that would be a pretty horrible system...
I don't think this would be a horrible system at all. I believe It should be your choice to choose who you would like to play with in any game you host. I dont believe this kind of system can be abused. if you are going to keep kicking a player you do not like, then it would be easier to simply blacklist them and their would be no reason to kick them repeatedly. So the boot Feature would simply be used just to remove players you would not like to play with at that Particular game.
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|