Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-24 23:21:39 |
Ξ Nanaimo
Level 56
Report
|
Shouldn't this be an achievement, just like the others? I did this in a game yesterday, but did not get an achievement. Is there a way to get this as an achievement? What do you guys think?
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-24 23:27:12 |
Mr. Gentleman*SEAHAWKSWONSUPERBOWLXLVIII*
Level 58
Report
|
you can unlock a new set of achievements in that category by achieving the 3 v 4 achievement.
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-24 23:45:34 |
Ξ Nanaimo
Level 56
Report
|
you mean taking a 4 with a 3
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-25 01:55:15 |
Mr. Gentleman*SEAHAWKSWONSUPERBOWLXLVIII*
Level 58
Report
|
yes
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-25 16:27:41 |
Ξ Nanaimo
Level 56
Report
|
something tells me that Mr. Gentleman is joking
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-25 21:36:51 |
Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
NinjaNic, you CAN get a 8v8 or any NvN with 100% luck. It is just that the odds of doing so are so incredibly low that they round down to zero. Such victories are mathematically possible but effectively impossible.
As to the OP, if a 4v4 merits an award then when do we stop? 5v5? 7v7? 10v10? Why reward people for bad strategy and ridiculous luck?
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-26 03:03:51 |
Nauzhror
Level 58
Report
|
On any luck of 67% or higher XvX is always possible.
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-26 07:39:43 |
6
Level 49
Report
|
100,000 v 100,000 would be so fun to do in a game
|
Taking a 4 with a 4: 2014-05-26 08:26:12 |
Cheery Dog
Level 57
Report
|
Want to see how long it takes to get it?
Dual map with bonuses at 100,000 and a army cap of 1 times your income.
Although I guess you're end up only attacking with 99,999 armies, I guess set the order to cyclic on truel and have the third territory a wasteland where someone can keep throwing an army at first turn.
|