I was scrolling through the six pages of tournaments that I am in/ was in/ am going to be in, just now and I realized that the tournaments tab is sorely underdeveloped.

1. You can't sort the open tournaments in any way

2. In order to find out if you are still in the tourney or not, you have to click it, find the game(s) that you are in, and then make sure that you have been eliminated or are still in the tournament.

I think it would make sense if there was an option to sort and filter open tournaments to make the tab easier to navigate. For example for filters:

*Tournaments that I have joined
*Tournaments that I have not joined
*Tournaments that I have declined
*Tournaments that I have neither joined or declined

I also think that on some level, it would make sense that all active tournaments can be viewed by all people. It is sometimes just interesting to see how another person's tournaments(s) are going.

By additions, I meant potential additions.

tornaments that didn't end or declined. Will get rid of a lot of useless torneys you aren't in or ended months ago.

We do need more options for this page badly. I am using tournaments I did not decline, but my list has ones that have ended, ones I am eliminated from (without new chats). It is very cluttered.

Or if you could at least manually delete tournaments from your list that would be nice too.

perhaps we can add "delete tornaments when your done" on uservoice.

good ideas

Bump because this really needs to be done.

If we could at least get word this is being worked on that would be huge.

good ideas

There's a Uservoice entry for this, I advice you to give it some votes: http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/1780953-add-tournament-filter-active-tournaments-that-you.

I think that a filter "Tournaments where I'm still playing" would be very useful. Or at least "Tournaments that I joined and that didn't finish" to filter out the finished tournaments.

I don't have any votes left on there.

I don't understand that site. you get 6 votes and you are done. Which means if someone posts a great idea, nobody can vote on it because they are already out of votes.

You can take away your vote from one idea and give it to the other. And you have 10 votes total. Meaning you can give one vote to ten ideas or give more votes (max 3) to some that are more useful. This limit is there to ensure that you want to vote for the best ideas there are and not just give max rating to every new idea.

Quite an interesting method of doing such a rating, does anybody know if it has a scientific name?

I guess my point is how will you ever get something new as high on the list as the top items (with hundreds of points)? Unless people that have already used their votes go back and check it out, they won't change to another idea. Seems like you'd want to get a new set of votes each week or something to keep people active

For example, I posted my airlift to non-teammate idea and I am the only one to vote for it. Yet on here lots of people said it was a great idea.

Nobody will ever find it either because it is already many pages deep now. Just seems like that format lends to tons of clutter and not much movement on idea rankings.

I see you point. Giving new votes periodically would lead to an ever rising amount of votes for a feature, which I don't think is desirable. But if the votes had an expiration date and would be returned to your "votes left" pool after e.g. 1 month, it would help to measure the current demand on new features rather than an all time highs. Especially since those votes could be very well added by long inactive users, who cares what feature they wanted? But then, this belongs to Uservoice's uservoice, rather than WarLight forum :)

I just hope that Fizzer does sometimes venture to the 3rd page of uservoice and implements some features that might not be the most wanted, but are easy enough to be implemented quickly.

Yeah, ease of implementation should be a factor. Some you'd think would be pretty quick and others not.