Uservoice: Elo: 2020-09-17 23:41:48 |
DrApe
Level 62
Report
|
Signed up for uservoice just to vote for this. Right now there is pretty much no point in staying on the ladder at 50 games - your rating just stops moving. The current implementation highly incentivizes gaming the rating system by waiting for games to expire and trying your luck on win streaks, enabling players to get highly inflated ratings by simply stalling their losses.
|
Uservoice: Elo: 2020-09-18 12:11:46 |
│ [20] │MASTER│ Rikku │ I love my wife │ • apex │
Level 61
Report
|
Play Warzone idle you shitbags
|
Uservoice: Elo: 2020-09-19 01:16:54 |
(deleted)
Level 62
Report
|
Fizzer doesn't care about the hardcore strategic community even though the game is "Strategy" where "Competitiveness" is a selling point in branding the game.
If he did, we would've had at least a response or changes applied accordingly. We've had the same crap rating systems and there's been years worth of discussions on basic fundamental things. It has killed the enthuasism for discussion on advance improvements which would highly benefit the game long-term for e.g. Rotating 2v2/3v3 ladder.
Hell, I wouldn't mind if he gave 5/6 sugar babes the power to take control of the whole ecosystem of the ladders. There's reliable community members who would apply changes in a sustained/managable fashion. E.g. Beren on the Seasonal Ladder originally.
It's quite demotivating playing a game where there's been such a lacklustre of prioritisation of an element of the game you most partake in!
|
Uservoice: Elo: 2020-09-22 18:48:03 |
berdan131
Level 59
Report
|
Put yourself in Fizzers shoes. He has limited time and he focuses his work on projects which give the best results, from his point of view.
You can't blame him for that. It's just a business.
You all are just too perfectionist. Taking it too personally when you shouldn't.
|