I'm in complete disagreement with that meaning that you're better, changed name. This season is nearly all luck, so I wouldn't be too impressed with being #1 in it. I think you probably are better than him just because Billy doesn't look like a good player and you seem to be solid. But it has nothing to do with the Seasonal Ladder.
I am the best player this site has ever seen: part deux, teh proof: 2012-11-04 21:19:48
You just proved my point Billy :) Every good player knows stats don't make much difference.
Last game you picked horribly again. I honestly don't know why you think you are great. Go ahead and invite me to a game. We can play a best of 5 series if you want :) Just don't cry when you lose to the guy with 50% 1v1 wins :p
I am the best player this site has ever seen: part deux, teh proof: 2012-11-04 22:39:31
OMG LOLLOOLOLOL UR LYK SOOOOOOOO BAD DA AAFBKEJB U TYED WIT 1 POEROSN I BEAT THREE PEOPLE ON MAH OWN TROLOLOLOLOALSOLKO CRUCIOHOHOHOHOHOHOOHbKHIKFSANL I SU MUCH MOAR 1337 THAN CHU
Please invite me to a game Billy. Beat me in a best of 5 series and you can say I am medicore. Unless you're scared of a guy with barely above 50% win rate?
I am the best player this site has ever seen: part deux, teh proof: 2012-11-05 03:42:03
Not that this has *ever* happened before, but...
...what if Billy here is indeed some excellent player who only acts like an overconfident wannabe with all this posting and bragging about cheap wins - just to lure someone like jsa into a challenge?
Wouldn't that be fun? I think that would be fun.
I am the best player this site has ever seen: part deux, teh proof: 2012-11-05 12:11:03
Moleftar, I had thought of that. But most good players won't play 250 games on a multiaccount. If he plays like he did in the games listed above, he won't have a chance though unless I play very stupidly.
I am the best player this site has ever seen: part deux, teh proof: 2012-11-05 13:27:02