myhand,

it's clear from your statistics that you don't play pick-up games. If you did, you would know that players who are clearly beaten will often drag the game out as long as they can hoping the winner will just drop for lack of time or out of boredom.

Random games are quite different than the games with cherry-picked opponents and stacked teams that you play.

If... you ... hadnt .... made..... this ..... thread u ..... woldunt be ......in so kuch ..... truoble!

what trouble?

ugh

a 'good' thing? a 'right' action? There you go again attributing some kind of morality to the landscape. It's neither good nor bad. The landscape doesn't care. It just is.


In any timed competition, one side is often happy to see the clock run out. Whether it is 'right' or 'wrong' that the clock should run out is not part of the equation.

the time constraint is PART OF THE GAME

the clock is part of the measure of the skill of a player

it is impossible to discuss with you, as you just repeat your only argument "it is like it is"
and dont defend against my argument "it doesn't follow, that it ought to be so"

poor taxidriver

Wtf we still arguing?

I'm not sure, he's being so cryptic.

He's not being cryptic, you just lack the required comprehension skills to understand his point.

It's philosophy.

Edited 8/20/2014 14:36:26

Warlight. The Game of Moral Sophistry.


could be a great new marketing tagline haha