38%
Very common score in this thread.

I got 62%. Just a few question...

Q12: Why wouldn't you attack Novo with 3?

Q13: Does move order really matter, since none of your opponents possible territories border Antarctica?

Q12 as well as a few others I disagree with, so won't comment on that ;).

As for 13 it matters, couse it might hide the number of troops you were attacking with.

Ah, ok.

38% :/

I thought the two questions on deploying to take the three contradicted each other though.

On the second question, you deploy 2 on Chad and 1 on DRC (or 0 on Chad and 3 on DRC). An attack with 1 kills 1. Then you can take the territory with 3v2, so you need less armies total.


I got 68%.
And I screwed up the first question somehow. I have no idea how that happened...

Thanks for that ^^ I was rushing I guess and didn't look properly :/)

I don't get how people can get 68%, 56%, etc. because there are only 13 questions possible.

SCORES ( Possible )
1/13 = 8%
2/13 = 15%
3/13 = 23%
4/13 = 31%
5/13 = 38%
6/13 = 46%
7/13 = 54%
8/13 = 62%
9/13 = 69%
10/13 = 77%
11/13 = 85%
12/13 = 92%
13/13 = 100%

So unless another factor had come into play (time, question "bonuses" or any other variable) then these should be the exact scores.

http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/quizreport.php?title=warlight-skillknowledge-evaluation-test&sid=30243161
hey why a noob like me could get a pass.

szeweningen,
A few suggestions:
- For each answer, don't just say which one is correct, but explain why it is correct (or, if you think it is didactically better, at least give a hint).
- Include a short recap of Strategic 1 vs 1 settings (number of initial armies per territory mostly) as a convenience for those who don't know by heart.
- What does "negative net income" on Question 5 mean?
- I suggest photoshopping the "7" on Ghana (Question 8) into a "1", since it's irrelevant for the question but could be distracting (just like good chess puzzles never have any pieces which are irrelevant).


TAFKAG:

Why did you all decide on Gui? It's certainly not my real name and not one of the usernames I use define me in any non-virtual sense. Maybe this is hard for you to understand, Dick. I came to warlight assuming an incognito account was a tabula rosa to be shaped any which way I want. Dick, your persistent nastiness is true as the north star.

Because we had to decide on something. You see, for the most part people choose a name (whether their real name, a derivative of their real name or a moniker) and stick with it. In those cases almost everyone (there will of course be the occasional exception...) will simply use that name to refer to them. What that name is doesn't matter, because it's just an identifier, something to recognise people by. That is why your continuous name changes caused "everyone" to settle on something ("gui" in this case) and go with it.
When you came to WL your "WL personality" was indeed a "tabula rasa" to the other WL players; any reputation you might have on any other site (or in real life, for that matter) did not carry over. However, once you came here you started getting a reputation, a way people know you. And you can't just reset that by changing your name. Changing your name and (simultaneously) your behaviour might do the trick, if you want it to.
Complaining about any nastiness you perceive in Richard seems a little strange, as you yourself are (in my opinion) by no means the most amicable person on these forums either.

I checked my usernames.

Maybe it's just me, but if even you yourself have to check the log of your previous usernames... how on Earth do you expect everyone else to keep track?

And, in case anyone wonders: http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/quizreport.php?title=warlight-skillknowledge-evaluation-test&sid=30244915 (yes, I messed up Q8... :X)

With standard settings on straight round attacking with 1 risks getting negative net income when you are attacking a territory with more than 1 troop on it.

What does this suppose to mean?

i got like 40 but i failed all the questions on straight round because i didn't really read through the question
and + my sat course didn't help me at all, there were no questions on general vocabulary, so your test is obviously bad szew ;(

damn you!!! quick meme damn you!!!

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3sffcd/


just click it


(sorry for the triple post)

Great misuse of the scumbag brain meme,it could not have been misused any other worse way and by a player that missues so much memes.Read up the memes at least before tring them if you can't work out what they are used like. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/scumbag-brain

31%. the result was poor :p

actually I can't tell the names of places of Earth maps :)

46%, but not a fan of some of the questions, and it's not the positioning-related ones, those I feel are important, it's the rest I don't think are as important. There's an analyze button ingame, I don't need to memorize what to attack with in various scenarios when the results can be checked before committing while ingame.

I believe those two deployment questions' only objective was to make you think about positional advantage. You can use analyze in game - ok, but with only it, you wouldn't come up with the idea of attacking from two teritorries as a technique to use less armies. As the two questions were one after the other - at least at the point when you see correct answers, you should start thinking why is there difference in total number of free troops on the border in both situations..

38, in the last 2 questions it is debatable, but your comment at the beginning talking about standard settings and the wording of the questions threw me off completely :S