and i will buy you a clan.


people who try this challenge :

Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 0-1
Panda 1-1
Green 0-1

Edited 8/14/2014 11:43:27

sure, what template?

then one that is used in ladder

If you're a top player, it's going to take a large amount of challenges. Because even players that are better than you are going to lose on luck sometimes - it is for this reason that you see brilliant players losing to mediocre players quite frequently.

A wise player once said that you can never exceed a 65-70% win rate against good players.

Lets say you're a good player, and even if someone wins against you 70% of the time. The chance of them beating you 5 times in a row is 0.7^5=0.16807~17%
So according to my really rusty stats they'd need to challenge you about 6 times to expect a win. (It's a geometric distribution right?)

Edited 8/12/2014 15:27:41

Plus there is no guarantee this person would follow through anyway, especially without using their real identity.

i am good player and i give garantee using my word.
i make this challenge becaus i think can not player win against me 5 times in a row.

i can give my word to the fizzer who created this game he can see who is my real identity.
i prosmise i pay if i lose

Would you allow someone to challenge you 6 times in a row? Or are we going to have to find 6 players who are a lot better than you? The chances are one of them will beat you (but they might not..)

Also are you using bad grammar to hide your identity, or is English not your first language?

Edited 8/12/2014 15:26:59

win 6 times in row is more difficult then win 5 times

I'm talking about playing 6 lots of 5-game-series. If the player usually beats you 70% of the time, they'd have to play 6 lots of 5-game-series to expect a payout.
Since they chance they'd a 17% chance to win 5 games in a row.

Edited 8/12/2014 15:30:07

no english is not my first language.

Ohh ok, that's fair enough.

how about the greece template that is used on the realtime ladder then?
please setup up the first game :) wouldn't mind having my own clan, it's hip, and always an endless source of drama ^_^

Strat 1v1? Sure I'll try for a laugh.

i play first player i win

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6799257

If you are really that good then you should make it win against you 3 times in a row....if you think about it if someone beats you 3 times it shows that the person is already better than you..so 5 times is just too much and with the luck involves even supreme players will lose. But nonetheless i like your idea and do you mind posting the challenge games that you get?

I'll play. Stray 1v1. No chance obviously but something to play for.

2th player i win. win 1 lose 1

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6799288
http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=6799634

The real question is whether you are good enough to beat them all 5 times straight. That is clearly not the case for Panda and I doubt it would even be true for Arun.

But hey, it's always easy to prove your supremacy by stacking the deck in your favor. I mean, obviously you are the superior player if you can accomplish something that is statistically 97% likely...

you say without logic. when it is so easy not lose why you not do this?

players can not lose. only i can lose. so you say not logical things. i play many player i can beat more then 5 times in a row.

I would like to try. I know I won't win, but I'd like to play against a good player.