I would like to try. I know I won't win, but I'd like to play against a good player.

Win, if you played another player with the same skill level as you then you would only have a 3% (1 in 32) chance of losing 5 consecutive games.

In other words, your challenge is complete crap and constructed to favor you to the extreme.

A truly excellent player would base the wager on the opponent's ability to beat them ONCE in FIVE tries, not FIVE in FIVE.

ahaha i never say i am best player. i say i am good player. so where arr you truly excellent player make this challenge?
no one make this challenge i only make this challenge. and you come here say this things and to insult me.

also, you logic say that this truly excellent player can come and beat me. because is truly excellent can beat me FIVE in FIVE. but here they not even have risk only i have risk. so why you insult me angryman?

I can't even make enough sense of that to reply. Just gibberish.

for you i make this challenge win 3 times in row. you think you can do this? what have you calculate is chance for you ?

also you say i have 1 in 32 chance to lose. so i say now I play 32 players. you say then i lose. how is challenge crap?

and sorry for bad english.

Why would I take on a challenge where I could win 2 of 3 games and still lose? That makes no sense.

Your challenge is not an actual challenge but one heavily weighted in your favor. A true challenge would be guaranteeing that you could win 5 straight against any opponent, or at least 4 of 5. Then I would give you some credit.

Richard, I think you've misinterpreted his challenge. I don't think he's doing it to prove that he's better - or even a good player. I think it's more like marc's tower challenge a few months ago.

I think he's providing a tool for challenging yourself, much like the single player levels or a 2v1 game. Although, since (even if you're better) the losses may only be luck, it's not a very good challenge.

Richard, what the hell? Why does it matter if it's in his favour? He just says, "if any of you can beat me 5 times in a row I'll buy you a clan."

He is the only one with anything to lose i.e. the cost of a clan. The challenge is for, get this, the challenger. It's supposed to be difficult to win the clan.

Ace, I might buy that if he hadn't said the following

i make this challenge becaus i think can not player win against me 5 times in a row

To me that comes across as a way for him to prove how good he is by stacking the deck in his favor. When no one wins 5 straight he can proclaim how much better he is than those other players even if he loses the majority of games.

Meh, I'll give it a go.

If he's not actually good I doubt he goes more than 10 challenges vs. decent people before he loses 5 in a row. So far he's 1-0 in such challenges (Panda).

Bad English...... = Gnuffone

i need say this. player making this challenge must be realtime. so invite to realtime game only

I'll totally beat you with ease, but I have no use in owning a clan.

i will play you !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Gnuffs English is not like this. It reads like someone faking slightly bad English. What about our recently departed?

ahahah I want to play!!

i'd say it's myhand

I can challenge myself, maybe i let me win a clan!