@schizio: No, but losing to me is a proof of suckiness.

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=3731441

This proves nothing.

"@schizio: No, but losing to me is a proof of suckiness."

Or just proof of having a really bad game.

Since, y'know, I wouldn't say that HHH sucks. You beat him, but he's still far better than you.

HHH is somewhat overrated. He's a good player, but compared to Gui, Sze, Dunga...he's nothing.

Lolowut please post the facepalm stuff here:/

Trollussa, look at HHH's last 10 ladder games. He's 5-5 in those games. Now compare that with Szeweningen's last 10 ladder games(9-1), Timi's last 10 games (8-2), and Mian's last 10 ladder games (10-0).

HHH is the site's most underrated 'pro'. Since he's a man of few words and won't bother to defend himself, I'll defend him.

HHH hosts 'elite' invitational RRs. This is where he grabs all of the aforementioned people and throws them into a Round Robin. His track record on those RRs? Unbelievable. Even in my anonymous RRs you can see how good HHH is. 1st one he tied, 2nd one he won.

You seem to think he's not that good because he loses to bad players sometimes. This is because HHH is known for predicting people's moves outstandingly well. When he loses to a bad player it's either: 1. He had bad luck 2. The bad player wasn't making logical moves, thus HHH had a hard time predicting or 3. HHH just downright didn't focus enough. You wouldn't focus either if you had been playing as long and as much as HHH has.

Compared to Gui, Szew, and Dunga.. I won't go into the long track record, but he's right there with them.

You don't know what you're talking about anyways. It's very doubtful you've played any of the 4 aforementioned players more than 10 times.

Also, right click my image and click view image. You'll shit bricks.

whoa nice one Lolowut, I shat bricks :)

Ok, Lolowut, I just looked at his record in your tournaments. Yeah, he's very good, but I never said "he's not that good", as you seem to think I said. He's certainly in the top 25 players on this site. I just don't think he's in the top 5 or anything, because of his ladder record. Please try to understand my argument before posting.

Also, yes, I have seen the aformentioned players (well, at least Sze and HHH) play at least 10 times. I don't think I need to play them in order to know how they play.

But Platypus, in order to jugdge other people's level of play, first you need to learn how this game is actually played...

'but compared to Gui, Sze, Dunga...he's nothing.'

Nothing is what I mean here. When do you see these players ever say that HHH was nothing compared to them? They all dread playing HHH. Tim dreads playing HHH. I explained quite reasonably why HHH doesn't do so hot on ladder.

i demand this thread title be changed, he is an imposter

Aah Billy... you so last year my dear.

HHH is somewhat overrated. He's a good player, but compared to Gui, Sze, Dunga...he's nothing.

Amen brother, somewhat overrated is an understatement.

apparently he used to be good, but the only people who fear facing him now are 1800s and Szeweningen because sze is the only one who remembers when he used to be strong. He doesn't spend long enough on moves to be anything other than sloppy and predictable imho.

teh thign about hhh is just that generation thing, he was one of the ebst players for a while, now there is a new generation of very good players, perhaps he will eb back in the next egneration, but in this one he is just a good player (which si better than what i am)

'but compared to Gui, Sze, Dunga...he's nothing.'

{RP} Lolowut [WG], Platypus, Juggernaut of Denmark, bring me these people, I would like to play against anyone who makes HHH look like nothing.

You were told once Billy, you have a whole thread about yourself, go and add to it.

how does one define one of the best players this 'generation'? #1 in 1v1 ladder? hhh did that a few months ago. #1 in 2v2 ladder? hhh has done it with 3-4 teammates and was first for most of the last 4 months. strong showing in seasonal ladders? he could've been top 5 last season but didn't bother playing his last game. this new 'generation' is more about me 1v1s. hhh is still better than nearly all newer players at 3v3 europe, especially cities which has less luck involved. live tournaments? only tim has won more.

discounting hhh for his lack of attention to ladder 1v1s is odd. should sze and I discount all players who can't play 3v3 europe cities near our level? hhh will be back to the top of the 1v1 ladder. nobody has done it three times. i wouldn't bet against him.

Master Gui please can I understand why europe cities is better than random warlord to prove the skills of a player? I tought that being able to play europe cities was simply a prove of a bigger resistance to boredom.