Lawlz is a idiot

His Balls, may I join your MMB fan club?

:D

Well that was a tough read!

I'm going to vote

G. Arun

.

Reasoning: if somebody gets bandwagoned quite clearly, and there's a considerable gap, we'll get far less information than we would get from a tight lynch. By doing this, I've put pressure on those who haven't voted to A) vote and B) give a little thought to their vote. Even if they're reasoning is flawed, I'm not too bothered - reasoning is the best chance of catching mafia.

Dom to me, this reasoning makes zero sense. All you do is make it more likely that a more active player is eliminated instead of an inactive or suspicious player. I am more suspicious of you now too.

Their*

I don't even think is will stimulate inactives to vote.

The fan club is just for me I'm afraid.

I take it that troll was lawlz's death throws. I guess he didn't understand the game at all.

Or he understands and that was an attempt at a double bluff.

No bother. As you were.

In fact it's time I voted.

Edited 9/1/2014 14:14:10

vote: blue

Arun, I make the vote count, before my vote, lawlz 3 or 4, you 1, everybody else 0. If I vote anybody else, then I'm spreading the vote, giving us less chance of causing people to make crucial votes. By making the votes 3v2 or 4v2, can you not see how much pressure the remaining voters are under?

People have to choice to not vote (suspicious), vote elsewhere and effectively waste their vote (suspicious if you're evil and lawlz isn't), or choose either of you, which will give us information regardless of your two roles.

Dom isn't is 2-2? If the situation was as you describe it would make much more sense. Let me check.

Yep 2-2 I believe.

STUPID LAWLZ!!! KILL YOURSELF!!! YOU RUINED MY GAME!!! ARGH!!!!

Cute.

Haha lol silver , my clone is better than yours , mine is unique

If he is unique, he is not a clone.

He is a uniuqe clone since he doest act the same as me :) do j want to see tha MysteryCloner?
Also your clone is of control

Edited 9/1/2014 14:50:22

Arun, top of page 4, I count 3 votes for lawlz in the first few posts of the page - discord, you, MMB

Didn't see MMB. Still very close though and earlier you advocated the lynching of inactives ;)

My preference would be to lynch an inactive, yes, but with 4 people having voted before me, then I would have needed pretty much every voter to a) actually vote and b) vote with me.

Which seems unlikely!


Had I waited a few moments, or longhouse voted a bit earlier, I would have voted Blue over you, if that's any consolation! ;)