well you know how when you play a diplomatic card it shows a D next to the players name that you played it on. I think that the site should offer a feature in games where you click on their name and can chose enter an alliance with them and there could be an A next to their name. Then depending on how the creator of the game gots it set up it could be public and those two A's will show the same colors so everyone can know. This would be good for Diplo games so people can keep track of all that more easier.

uservoice
http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features

like 10th thread this week about how fizzer should make an official diplomacy game settings, just emial him at randy@warlight.com and if he says yes then hoorah, if no then please people stop asking for different diplomacy settings, at least htis one is a good idea for diplomacy games

seahawks - why not? i think if there is a community which fancies diplo games, then why not implement features for them? it all depends on Fizz. If he wasn't this to stay conservative, then he won't but if he values expanding to various target, then he will do it after some time. but i doubt it's going to be anytime soon, because there is so much to do in the core of warlight - for example tournaments system or finishing his iOS baby app.

Malamute, there are too many different variables, and types of alliances, to make it work.
If he implemented a button which you clicked so you remembered who you are allied with, great, but then making it public, so other players can see who you are allied with, isn't a good idea.

Also you can transfer only, so that way alliances cant backstab anymore XD

This kind of thing would undermine the whole system. People would ask for 50 troops in return for not attacking, next turn attack anyway with larger stacks against smaller defences. Also not being able to back-stab defeats the point of making alliances and breaking them at opportune moments in time.

It wholly depends on how far Fizzer decides to implement the diplo ideas, but there are too many different scenarios, or choices, so in create games it would need t have it's own section (in addition to Basic, Map, Initial Distribution, Armies Cards and Open Seats.

Also you can transfer only, so that way alliances cant backstab anymore XD

This is a bit too far in terms of diplomacy.If diplomacy was able to be put in settings people won't complain about being back-stabbed and they will know some games are not meant to have diplomacy.I agree with this idea.