Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:19:39 |
Little Blue
Level 41
Report
|
One thought, is that I cannot imagine that a witch would attempt to steal immunity from the claimed seer, immediately after losing one witch the very first round.
Since we did get a witch first turn, we have some time to figure things out... I don't like seeing players eager to call for votes when they can't be changed.
One last thing, I also don't like to see over-analysis like Dr. Stupid gave, it stinks of trying too hard to make a case against someone based off of practically nothing.
Edited 12/19/2014 03:22:17
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:23:30 |
myhandisonfire
Level 54
Report
|
Psychological conditioning? Hitler? seriously? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMubnxLRwDM@Little Blue It's a fallacy, the thing is that they MUST steal immunity eventually. The sooner the better for the witches, for damage control.
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:25:31 |
Little Blue
Level 41
Report
|
The sooner they steal it the sooner they announce themselves though. I don't see how that's a smart move turn 2. It would need to be later when the population was thinned enough that they could keep control.
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:27:17 |
Lawlz
Level 41
Report
|
All he's trying to do is protect himself, and I am on his side. I personally think mmb has been too quiet, so that's where my vote is directed.
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:41:31 |
Little Blue
Level 41
Report
|
Don't tell people not to talk, or we don't get as much information.
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:59:01 |
Little Blue
Level 41
Report
|
We get limited information in these games:
Votes Night Actions Comments
Telling someone to give less information to the group is stupid for the village. You two don't have to go at it if you don't want to, but don't tell him not to talk to other people.
I don't think you're a witch, even though you don't seem to be helping the village. Could be just trying to make it seem too obvious for anybody to actually bother with you though.
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 03:59:30 |
qwed117
Level 49
Report
|
(I'm dead already? That poses serious consequences for the witches)
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 04:37:39 |
Seahawks
Level 54
Report
|
Myhands verification is that no one counterclaimed his role, and you dr stupid, are stupid to try and steal his spot, VOTE DR STUPID
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 04:43:40 |
Seahawks
Level 54
Report
|
we all agreed with myhands plan, dr stupid is obviously witch that tried to steal first spot, while myhands claim is unverified the fact that no one else has counter claimed his role shows that he is indeed the seer, so I beg you, fellow townsfolk, slay dr stupid, as he is both stupid, and a witch
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 05:04:18 |
myhandisonfire
Level 54
Report
|
sigh...
Okay I will address you again Dr.Stupid.
It is a bit tiresome, because you have no real arguments and you fail to see my logic, but I will do it again for the village to see and understand.
1+2 : By trying to cast doubt upon me, you are in fact sabotaging the village. It is not certain how much your actions will harm the village, but it is likely that people will get confused by your efforts and make mistakes, or have unjustified doubts. So yes, I would not be sorry to have you lynched even as a villager unless you change your ways and understand what is going on. There is a good possibility that you are a witch instead of a just plain stupid villager and therefore lynching you is better than anybody else, because we have not the slightest information on anybody else. The bandwagoned people are all dead and I cant blame Kellen for voting on the guy that voted him first out of the blue.
3: Why was it so important that I dont get first vote? Please enlighten me with your faulty logic. I already explained that you are wrong, the other seer can in fact find out about whether or not I am telling the truth. He will not have to waste a nights action on something he can find out in the course of 2/3 nights anyways. Still you proposed that he should look into me, to verify if i am the real seer or not. That gives another good idea of either your shortsightenedness or your vile evilness as a witch. Because if he would find me innocent, he would have no way of telling anyone, since he would have to reveal himself to the village and the witches. How would the village know he even looked into me?
4: Yes outed, as in "I out myself as seer" or "I out myself as being homosexual". If you out yourself as a homosexual, you are not a verified homosexual yet, you could still be lying.
5: I didnt tie you to anything. I just stated that I was about to be killed and I urged everyone to cast the votes on Semi, since his behaviour was ridiculously suspicous. Yes, you voted him, very early, which makes it likely that you are just being (dr.)stupid here, instead of a witch.
6; I have to ask you: "Would you think that the seer voting first everyday is a good idea, or not?" Can you see the logic there? Your failure to see the logic makes you suspicious. Not the fact that you are suspicous of me eventually not being a seer. If you wouldnt know about me being a seer, you would still have to wait for a moment when I either claim someone a wolf who isnt, or villager who turns out to be a wolf. I didnt really want to influence the voting to much against arun, I just wanted my protection. Your willigness to take it away without a good reason, a good explanation, or a debate with the whole village beforehand is what makes you suspicious, its incredible that you fail to see that. So lynching you serves the purpose of uniformity that no villager should vote BEFORE me. WITCHES HAVE TO VOTE FIRST TO GET RID OF ME. If you would like to change the deal why didnt you do it like little blue? He asks the village beforehand, whether or not it would be a good idea to not have me vote first or not. This is the way how its done and i am open to it and willing to discuss it.
Even as a villager you should now say : "oh, my bad, I fucked up, I agree, lynching me has to be done, even though its a mistake, MY mistake, because i am no freaking witch" And why is that? Because even if we dont lynch you now and I will look into you, you would still be killed in the night by the witches and we gain absolutely nothing.
I see only one scenario, in which we would now have a serious problem and that is you being the other hero.
Edited 12/19/2014 05:14:18
|
Witch Hunt!: 2014-12-19 05:27:21 |
Dr. Stupid
Level 60
Report
|
"oh, my bad, I fucked up, I agree, lynching me has to be done, even though its a mistake, MY mistake, because i am no freaking witch"
What the what???
Ok, so I guess here's the number one thing that confuses me about your foolproof plan. Since you were immune to wolf kills on night 1 and since you had publically "outed" yourself as a seer, why didn't you tell us who you were seering BEFORE you seered them?
You claim to have this brilliant plan and be the guy with all the answers, but if that's true, why this numbskull move? What possible good reason would you have in withholding that information when we could have avoided this whole inane argument in the first place?
In fact, this ends now. If you take me down, I'm going to be sure that you're true identity is revealed. If you're telling the truth, this helps you, right? You're safe tonight, right?
Who ya gonna seer? Declare it now because there is absolutely no risk to you in doing so.
Who ya gonna seer?
|
Post a reply to this thread
Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos.
|
|