666

this is the wrong approach to a question like this. It depends a lot on how you split the options.
For example, there maybe
20% of ppl want 3days + 0,
20% want 2days + 2days,
20% want 2.5days + 1day
15% want 4days + 0
25% want 1 day + 0

If you give these options, then obviously 1day + 0 would win.
If you give the options
A) 3day
B) 1day
then everyone chooses what is closest to their preferrence, and A) would win with 75%.

anyways, i dont think it makes a difference here due to the overwhelming majority on 666.
also: 666 for me aswell

@master of desaster & GiantFrog, Current (3-Day) system is helping stallers to cheat the game. So Fizzer proposed an alternative approach but it was disliked due to how short alternative boot-time is.

Those options you see are the intermediary options (shorter than current, longer than Fizzer's alternative). Some options focused on banked time, some focused on refresh, some in regular time, some in simplicity. You guys can dislike the options, its perfectly fine. I'm not gonna discuss it. This is not for discussion, only for survey answers

Edit: I already encouraged people to write their own options if they disliked presented options, please stick to the format. This is just for visualizing community perspective, not to implement the one with highest vote

Edited 5/8/2023 06:31:26

"@master of desaster & GiantFrog, Current (3-Day) system is helping stallers to cheat the game. So Fizzer proposed an alternative approach but it was disliked due to how short alternative boot-time is."

uhhh...

666

the stalling problem will be solved to a big part by the new rating system. Besides, your options of 12 days or whatever huge bank times you suggest are hilarious, especially in that regard. why would base boot time even matter for most games, if you can easily play your average games just on that bank time alone?

Sorry for not sticking to the format. I feel the need to talk about such topics on threads that might affect fizzers decisionmaking if all options but one out of 6 are just bullshit.

Edited 5/8/2023 07:06:00

Since survey is here, I understand your urge to start a discussion here, but you'll get no answer from me in this thread. If you copy that to ladder discussion thread (https://www.warzone.com/Forum/689303-1day-boot-ladder-update?Offset=60), I'll be happy to reply

I like how Vera manipulated everyone into becoming Satanist and writing 666 :D

it's fine if you ignore me, I'm already happy when others, especially Fizzer read this and hopefully realize, that this thread and the result of the survey can be disregarded for the reasons I stated.

Then I really hope they're not people who get influenced just because some person is shouting louder. As long as the shouter don't even try to get a response, they should always stay sceptical

Q1
2) Probably the most balanced between anti-stalling and not forcing to play when you don't want to/ can't play. I would maybe decrease the maximum banked time to 4 or 5, though.
Q2
5) Especially in non-fixed teams, you really want to have at least 3 days to make orders per turn, plus something banked for picks & busy days. This option is the closest. Would prefer something like 3 days + 08.0 Day Banked-Time + 06 Hour Refresh (Average Boot-Time).
Q3
5) Same as above. Would prefer something like 4 days + 08.0 Day Banked-Time + 06 Hour Refresh (Average Boot-Time).

> Then I really hope they're not people who get influenced just because some person is shouting louder. As long as the shouter don't even try to get a response, they should always stay sceptical

VERAVARI, ONCE AGAIN I AGREE. PEOPLE SHOULD ALWAYS BE SKEPTICAL - OTHERWISE THEY ARE JUST DUMB SHEEP. WE SHOULD BE LIKE SPOCK AND MAKE UP OUR MINDS UP BASED ON EVIDENCE AND REASON, AND NOT BE SWAYED BY WHOEVER IS SHOUTING THE LOUDEST. BUT DON'T WORRY - US WARZONE PLAYERS KNOW THAT MASTER OF DESASTER IS JUST THE MASTER OF BEING A LOUDMOUTH.

666, and agreed with other suggestions that the team ladder could use some extra banked time on top since it can take longer to coordinate, on top of the usual reasons to have the boot time be 3d

a message from chatGPT to fizzer:

Dear Sir Fizzer,

I am writing to express my concerns about the current booting time for ladder, specifically the 1v1 mode. In my opinion, the new booting time of 1v1 ladder "1 day" is quite unreasonable, as it doesn't give players enough time to commit their turn. A booting time this short will make the ladder unplayable for some players who may not have a lot of free time.

On the other hand, I feel that the old booting time "3 days" is quite lengthy. While I understand that some players may need more time to ensure their strategy and commit their turn or to accommodate holidays and small vacations, going this long may make some players feel bored or uninterested in the game.

As a result, I urge you to review and adjust the booting time for the ladder accordingly. Perhaps, increasing the booting time to 2 days. This would strike a balance between giving players enough time to strategize and commit their turn, while also ensuring that the game remains playable and engaging for all players.

I hope that you will take my concerns into consideration and make appropriate modifications to the game.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

666

666

6, 6, 6

666

666

666