Legally, no concern, anything you put into WZ is no longer owned by you.
Morally, I'm still okay with it. What's the alternative? Live without these mods forever? Are we forbidden to write mods that do the same things?
RE: JK's point:
So thats the dilemma we're currently facing, it goes against Dan to revive the mods, and for the community it would be good.
Imho, without a message from Dan on this, we can't know what his intentions were, maybe he just wanted to leave a clean trail behind himself, as since he is gone, he can't update/upgrade his mods if anything changes with WZ, etc. Imho it doesn't go "against" him at all. I believe he left b/c WZ is no longer good for him, but he doesn't wish WZ itself or the userbase (maybe save the ones he argued with that led to him leaving) any ill wishes. So let's not read into his actions. He didn't say "screw you all, I hate you all, goodbye", he just left.
So sure we could just rewrite the mods, but imho we're not obligated to nor should we erase Dan from WZ history. Rather than just rewrite it and pretend it never existed, I'd rather use his code and just add comments that says "original code by DanWL, modified by XYZ". I've done this at work when writing code that former employees wrote. Others have done it with my code. This isn't really any different. Give him the credit for the original, leave him in WZ history where he belongs for his contributions.
Dan even has text in his github code (see JK's post for the link) which grants "without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense", so imho there's no issue here. He simply removed himself as the uploader/active maintainer of the mods and clearly already gave his pre-consent for us to recreate his mods.
Edited 7/15/2024 19:34:59